Viewing profile — qboltz
qboltz
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 17, 2021, 7:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 20
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qboltz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #31435628
They do, I run GNU Guix but you have to buy a wifi card that's free software compatible, which must be bought somewhere else. https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/wireless-n-dual…
-
comment
Comment #30849018
> We can, but none of that is verifiable. We can come up with hypotheses and test them. We can look at literature which observed things in the past or make truth claims and evaluat…
-
comment
Comment #30847903
"Why stop there? Why not say we even know that there are billions of years? Why not thousands?" My questions above are only to point out what I think is the conclusion to your line…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #30316895
I don't think was specific enough, I guess what I'm looking for is something that we can describe with language that doesn't have at least some sort of parameterization in regards …
-
comment
Comment #30313007
Could you cite some specific examples? I'm finding the deeper I study biology, the more certain I am that complex models with both classical and quantum parameters will eventually …
-
comment
Comment #30246006
I'd be interested to hear your opinion defending professional sports taking itself as seriously as it does then. From my perspective, the only thing that makes it serious is the am…
-
comment
Comment #30167547
I don't think it's too negative. The actual complexity is high for the modeling, but very few of the abstractions are any worse than other many body simulations, unless you're stud…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #30117080
Level of theory as it relates to an-initio QM calculations usually indicates Hartee Fock, MP2 and so on, then the basis set gets specified after. I also agree that QM doesn't provi…
-
comment
Comment #30116994
All simulations have to make the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, nuclei have to be treated as frozen, otherwise electrons don't have a reference point. There will never be true kno…
-
comment
Comment #30116942
Not if you're going off of ab initio theory such as Hartee Fock, MP2, CC, etc. We're talking amounts of matrix multiplication that wouldn't be enough to finish calculating this dec…
-
comment
Comment #30116889
When you say ab initio calculations, could you cite the level of theory? I think there could be some ambiguity given differences in scope.
-
comment
Comment #29947495
I'm very optimistic about RISCV adoption, I'd wager this is the year the major distributions start preparing to host stable releases for it, or at least Fedora. There's a Guix deve…
-
comment
Comment #28726413
What's your broader economic framework for this analysis? From your comment history georgist/LVT adjacent. But the responses seem very well connected and elaborate beyond that with…