Viewing profile — qarl2
qarl2
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 21, 2026, 2:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 27
- Public activity
- 138 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About qarl2
I have created this new account so that I may continue to provide my legitimate (albeit unpopular) arguments and opinions.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49259014
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, my friend. You have a nice day.
-
comment
Comment #49251211
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49251050
Straw man.
-
comment
Comment #49251026
No, your country is directly killing people. No third party involved. > dufus Tsk tsk.
-
comment
Comment #49250126
No - really - my question here is an important one. If you did not ask for the rejection letter - that would indicate that you didn't even do the most basic checking to determine t…
-
comment
Comment #49250069
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49248967
Good. Because it seems pretty obvious that the algorithm profoundly influences awareness.
-
comment
Comment #49248842
So you deny the algorithm profoundly influences awareness then?
-
comment
Comment #49248824
I am making the fairly obvious point that Americans don't care about the Cubans like they did the Palestinians, despite the fact that the Cubans are directly suffering under the Am…
-
comment
Comment #49247993
So where are the street protests for Cuba then? I marched for Gaza three times. I haven't seen a single one for Cuba. I'm not saying empathy is a Chinese psyop. The empathy is real…
-
comment
Comment #49245988
Not really - China doesn't care about other nuisance issues. Look at how the TikTok kids (who went nuts for the Palestinians) don't give a crud about the Cubans.
-
comment
Comment #49245436
> little to no benefit to the community besides a handful of jobs NBER w35194 (Alvarez et al., May 2026) instruments for siting and finds the opposite: +6.2% establishments and +8.…
-
comment
Comment #49242231
Heh. The HN hivemind insists on censoring me without discussion. Does this seems like rational behavior, guys? Surely if I'm doing something wrong you can explain it to me with wor…
-
comment
Comment #49238435
Fair enough. Did you ask him for the full rejection letter? That's the issue I raised below. I'm wondering if he forged the app name. It seems like the situation still remains a li…
-
comment
Comment #49238372
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49236780
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49235250
> The retraction post from Gruber details ways in which he tried to fact-check this Yes it does. To fact check this story - he asked the source (twice) if he was lying. > I'm not r…
-
comment
Comment #49234827
My dear friend, both questions are asking about the same ratio, just using different language.
-
comment
Comment #49234820
> We got a full-throated retraction. Not really. When he says "I was misled" he's passing the blame. Other statements are equally defensive. Notice how the retractions of larger pu…
-
comment
Comment #49234787
No. You misunderstand my question. Again. I want to know if the human effort, per story, is the same as other publications. Does Gruber make a real fact checking effort, or does he…
-
comment
Comment #49234299
No, my question is whether the per-story fact checking is equal, or much less. I suspect it's much less. Do you know otherwise?
-
comment
Comment #49234059
Agreed. Which is why I raise the point.
-
comment
Comment #49233968
I don't doubt that massive organizations make a lot of errors. I don't think it makes your point, tho. The question is error per volume. I seriously doubt Gruber does the same amou…
-
comment
Comment #49233642
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49233634
When you spread disinformation you should bear the cost of it. Gruber has a massive audience. He should try harder.