Viewing profile — pyninja
pyninja
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Mar 13, 2011, 1:39 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 142
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pyninja
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37776655
So many red flags in the abstract alone. It's no surprise that the article itself looks like a middle school project.
-
comment
Comment #37776648
You sound very confused.
-
comment
Comment #2946663
How do you screw up tapping with two fingers?
-
comment
Comment #2942690
Using `display: table` is a great way to lay out your elements in a grid while keeping your HTML semantic.
-
comment
Comment #2942682
> view source Are you trying to tell me that PG is not a web designer?!
- story
-
comment
Comment #2834567
Any chance of doing an internship? I'm doing my master's in maths in Berlin and have experience with development in Python and Clojure.
-
comment
Comment #2831431
Are you serious?
-
comment
Comment #2831427
No, that's not what he's saying... and I don't know if you realize this, but the author, P.J. Eby, is the same guy who wrote the original WSGI spec.
-
comment
Comment #2822371
> Maybe my "simple" is to have the ability to yield chunks of data as it gets generated using chunked transfer. I'm curious, have you ever actually had to do this? Even Rails only …
-
comment
Comment #2822330
I agree with you, but Pump is not a web framework. You are not supposed to write your application with Pump. Picasso is a framework I built on top of Pump ( https://github.com/adee…
-
comment
Comment #2810699
I'd like to do that, but I'm afraid of how much time and effort it would take. I really just wrote Pump/Picasso to use at our new startup, Beagle ( http://beagleapp.com ). I was ex…
-
comment
Comment #2810653
Werkzeug and WebOb are not what I'm trying to do. I'm reposting a reply I made earlier to irahul: Pump aims to replace WSGI entirely. That is, I believe it does a better job of wha…
-
comment
Comment #2810600
Thanks for the feedback. I'm not willing to accept that WSGI couldn't be this simple. Pump's specification is modeled on Ring for Clojure ( https://github.com/mmcgrana/ring ), and …
-
comment
Comment #2810589
Here is an example of a thread where it's discussed: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/2009-November/threa...
-
comment
Comment #2810561
Pump aims to replace WSGI entirely. That is, I believe it does a better job of what WSGI was intended to do. I understand your point that web developers don't necessarily work with…
-
comment
Comment #2810513
The problems with start_response have been discussed at length in Web-SIG. As far as I know, they're planning to remove it from the spec in WSGI 2.0 (whenever that's published).
-
comment
Comment #2810473
# Pump def app(request): return { "status": 200, "headers": {"content_type": "text/plain"}, "body": "Hello World"}
-
comment
Comment #2810444
Yes, Pump was heavily inspired by Rack and especially Clojure's Ring ( https://github.com/mmcgrana/ring ).
-
comment
Comment #2810435
I hadn't seen this, looks interesting.
-
comment
Comment #2810430
Building web apps! Basically, it's meant to be a replacement for WSGI. In my view, the problems with WSGI are that it has an unpythonic API (see: start_response and environ), and t…
- story
-
comment
Comment #2807935
Surprised he didn't link to Reichenstein's essay on the topic: http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/100E2R
-
comment
Comment #2722583
Which is why you should keep your bookmarks in the cloud :)
-
comment
Comment #2722506
I solve this problem by bookmarking the website and putting some keywords, like "automated software install", in the description.