Viewing profile — pwm
pwm
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 11, 2013, 2:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 602
- Public activity
- 249 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pwm
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44386131
Sic transit gloria mundi
-
comment
Comment #44208908
I'm assuming a lot is coming from companies where there's fomo that if you don't use the latest and greatest tooling, your competitors will and you'll be left behind.
-
comment
Comment #43872543
Artificial | Full-time | Remote (Europe) | London | https://artificial.io/careers/ We are building the specialty (re)insurance landscape of the future. Our technology is revolution…
-
comment
Comment #43673671
Thanks for this! It's always nice to learn about the origins of things. I was around when they were called "self"/"super", but I never made the connection to OOP.
-
comment
Comment #43672680
I would love to read more about all this, especially how overlays came from "object-oriented" programming. To me, the interesting part is their self-referential nature, for which l…
-
comment
Comment #43279063
TIL there's a vouche feature. Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #41329743
One thing I've discovered and utilised from a relatively early age was synergising the difference in how my conscious and subconscious processes information. It's really just the u…
-
comment
Comment #41254038
Apologies for my meta-meta-comment :) I've been writing code for ~30 years in various languages, and today my brain can't compute how people find any syntax other than this more in…
-
comment
Comment #40166958
Very cool! We developed similar technologies for a very different domain (insurance automation). Side note: I also think that weaving logical inference and llms together into a vir…
-
comment
Comment #36329163
I know next to nothing about these but a friend of mine was grumbling the other day about why can't he just use his electric car's huge battery to power his house. It sounded like …
-
comment
Comment #34909813
https://archive.is/8jV2P
-
comment
Comment #34522053
> I think for the last 10 years of my career at BigTech, I can't possibly quantify my impact in numeric terms because they were such small pieces of gargantuan projects. Honestly, …
-
comment
Comment #33741225
I know a lot of people dislike bitcoin here but I'm wondering (with the huge assumption that its value stabilises over time) would it not actually be a better solution? Not just fr…
-
comment
Comment #33519057
Not sure if you’d win that bet or not but my anecdata is that me and probably the majority of my social circle spend near-0 on alcohol and sweets. They/we buy good quality food and…
-
comment
Comment #33264710
Pretty much yep. I'd also say it boils down to age which tends to correlate with having a family and also better WFH conditions. When I was young, single, living in a small apartme…
-
comment
Comment #33244707
At our company we came to the same conclusion. We have a DSL that is essentially a programmable schema to describe the shape of the data (more specifically a contract) you want to …
-
comment
Comment #33213487
It feels like there is an article like this every other week. They reflect the same generic view which is broadly true yet I think is not very useful as an advice. In a highly crea…
-
comment
Comment #32162702
> Likewise, it's not an audit trail it's a "history" or "undo". Depends on the industry. The one I work in audit trail is a well-defined and mandatory business concern.
-
comment
Comment #32112197
> forever being assaulted by Result . Without .unwrap() your progress would be destroyed as you'd have to immediately deal with every unhappy path. I don't know much about Rust but…
-
comment
Comment #31778737
Not OP but they meant https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.16.1.0/docs/Data-... As you have the normal map function for Functors (using Haskell): > :t fmap fmap :: Functor f …
-
comment
Comment #30861119
> So in essence I could think of types as functions (possibly nullary) from types to types? Type constructors, yes. In Haskell the type of type constructors are called kinds: λ> :k…
-
comment
Comment #30834848
It's just semantics. data Bool = False | True data Maybe a = Nothing | Just a Bool is a nullary type constructor or simply type. False and True are nullary data constructors or sim…
-
comment
Comment #30832355
Sum types are one of those things missing from most mainstream languages that people don't even realise that they are deprived of something fundamental. They naturally complement p…
-
comment
Comment #30580965
In the context of Haskell "ad-hoc" means ad-hoc polymorphism. See https://wiki.haskell.org/Polymorphism for details on parametric (ie. unconstrained) vs. ad-hoc (ie. constrained) p…
-
comment
Comment #30580149
For readers wondering why this is, there are a few things at play here. I preface my explanation by saying that the benefit of type classes vastly outweigh issues like the above ex…