Viewing profile — pwdisswordfish9
pwdisswordfish9
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 05, 2021, 7:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 530
- Public activity
- 451 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pwdisswordfish9
Please do not be disrespectful toward others.
Separate the commenter from the comment.
Smart commenters still make dumb comments now and then. And vice versa.
Consequently, the "identity" of the commenter is not a reliable predictor of the quality of the comment.
Shared accounts such as this one can address this problem.
Each comment must stand on its own, apart from identity and historical karma.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34473013
Got some links? Would love to read.
-
comment
Comment #34473005
Why are you blathering about tea?
-
comment
Comment #34472988
That depends on how selfish you are.
-
comment
Comment #34472028
While I'm sure it's annoying, this post is not a good look and reads rather unhinged. I'm also not sure what it's meant to accomplish other than venting.
-
comment
Comment #34469704
As if apple would have their services obey firewall restrictions.
-
comment
Comment #34447614
The QuickDraw source code has been available for some time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2285569 > Submitted several times to HN since then. Most recently: https://news.yco…
-
comment
Comment #34430933
> Parsing HTML isn’t trivial: aside from bad/invalid HTML (think: missing opening/closing tags, quotes, etc), there’s also a lot of content that requires javascript to render in th…
-
comment
Comment #34414709
Speaking of Atom/RSS: There's no reason to have a separate /archives resource and a /feed.xml (with or without content negotiation). You can just specify some external XSLT with an…
-
comment
Comment #34412042
https://www.w3.org/TR/tabular-data-primer/#dialects
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34411414
A bookmarklet is more or less just a JS expression that executes on command (the user's, that is). The execution model is approximately the same as for content-delivered scripts, a…
-
comment
Comment #34401060
You don't need an extension to do that. You can get by with a bookmarklet, which would be wise, considering how much contempt browser makers have for extension authors.
-
comment
Comment #34400967
They are approximately as big of a risk as any other third-party code you install from the Web onto your machine (e.g. tools from dev SDKs).
-
comment
Comment #34396562
What is "OWF" here? Open Web Foundation? If so, that's such a weird choice to mention. It has approximately nothing to do with browser standards. It's not even as if it's a ceremon…
-
comment
Comment #34374516
> This promising engine [Servo] was developed by Mozilla[...] Mozilla fired a quarter of their developers, which apparently included the whole Servo team. There have still been som…
-
comment
Comment #34318087
> you can't just pick out the bits from the 1900's that you liked, and then abandon the bits you think you dont like, independently of each other Wait a second, sure you can. Why c…
-
comment
Comment #34311533
As always, it needs to be said that selection bias is a thing; these surveys do not show people who . They measure Stack Overflow users who (... and then responded to a request to …
-
comment
Comment #34282230
Everyone is quick to say something like, "You're not living by the same standards that were the norm 90 years ago." The response is wanting. Notably, it's not the same as saying, "…
-
comment
Comment #34274988
So we agree that he didn't write it singlehandedly, then. jonah_hill_fuck_me_right?.jpg (We don't agree on the appropriateness of the description that he "was involved", however. T…
-
comment
Comment #34274935
> GitHub themselves say [1] Irrelevant. You're quoting docs.github.com, which is neither authoritative (docs are written to GitHub's documentation standards, not by their legal tea…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34263898
Not true. It is an option by virtue of the fact that is a public repository. (If you fail to specify a license on a public repository, the terms that apply are not the default "all…
-
comment
Comment #34259576
If you "don't have an issue" with JavaScript but you think the tools you're using are bad because of the "depth of hole you can quickly end up in though is not to be underestimated…
-
comment
Comment #34253574
> no substantial modern application can possibly be built without them Check out Firefox.
-
comment
Comment #34253454
Instead of whinging you could just write your own script, if for some reason you're not okay with running the same code as tons of other people?