Viewing profile — pwdisswordfish6
pwdisswordfish6
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 01, 2021, 5:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 135
- Public activity
- 70 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pwdisswordfish6
Please do not be disrespectful toward others.
Separate the commenter from the comment.
Smart commenters still make dumb comments now and then. And vice versa.
Consequently, the "identity" of the commenter is not a reliable predictor of the quality of the comment.
Shared accounts such as this one can address this problem.
Each comment must stand on its own, apart from identity and historical karma.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26716686
Fortunately, although it is pay-to-play, it's not pay-to-win. Oracle (or any other well-heeled player) can spend half a million or more in legal fees trying to go after a small com…
-
comment
Comment #26646368
That marks attempt #3 here at begging the question.
-
comment
Comment #26643128
This is the second instance of an attempt on your part to use circular reasoning so that it might be impossible to argue with you. It's clear now that you're just here for the conf…
-
comment
Comment #26643082
The remark "you might want to reconsider whether your powers of self-diagnosis" is not using "consider" in the same sense that I used it in the comment you're replying to. You are …
-
comment
Comment #26642935
> I never said that I know . I said it. Why am I having to repeat this? > what part of your description was condescending What? I'm not saying my description was condescending. It …
-
comment
Comment #26640537
Two straightforward questions. You already dodged one when it was framed as an observation; I'll repeat it again as an explicit question. 1. Do you think that your comment https://…
-
comment
Comment #26640417
You're right, it's my quote--where I gave an inline description about what was condescending about it. Since you asked, I repeated it.
-
comment
Comment #26633509
> how to human
-
comment
Comment #26633500
> Given that you felt the need to say that, you might want to reconsider[...] You're responding to an anonymous comment on a message board with zero IRL context. Consider your own …
-
comment
Comment #26633474
Actual problem: not understanding the distinction between a bug report and form meant for "asking others to do something for you".
-
comment
Comment #26629908
You're pointing to cases to invalidate the claim as if that claim was supposed to be interpreted to be bracketed by a universal quantifier. It wasn't, and arguing in that way is no…
-
comment
Comment #26629656
So you're doubling down on condescendingly explaining how to human. Cool. Consider this: I have a high emotional IQ and acutely understand whatever lesson you think you're impartin…
-
comment
Comment #26629528
I'll note that you didn't start your response here with pleasantries, and no one else has, either. By leaping at the opportunity to condescendingly explain human behavior, you've s…
-
comment
Comment #26627515
Strong disagreement from here. I don't want that kind of stuff in bug reports for the same reason that I don't want to have to deal with "hello", "good morning", from coworkers in …
-
comment
Comment #26609273
No, you're done. > language that's already ~30 years old by now Relevance?
-
comment
Comment #26606355
Sounds like a double standard and possibly moving the goalposts. There are strongly typed languages that don't have those features, and compiler codebases that don't use that kind …
-
comment
Comment #26606163
You know all those jokes that people like Linus make about Real Programmers—the ones who have hair on their chests, etc—you know those are all jokes , right? Jokes in the laughing-…
-
comment
Comment #26606049
Write a compiler in a strongly typed language, and then remove all the type annotations. This may come as a shock, but this is what a compiler (or any codebase) could look like whe…
-
comment
Comment #26597534
You are limited to one *.neocities.org site, otherwise it's $60 per year.
-
comment
Comment #26587659
> I swear I didn't see factories-making-factories-making-factories until that thing was published No? That's a pretty good description of the sort of metaprogramming that Lisp give…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #26262622
Google Reader ≠ RSS.
-
comment
Comment #26262589
Hacker News was never good.
-
comment
Comment #26261670
You must be new here to expect Hacker News to read an article before commenting.
-
comment
Comment #26248140
That’s right. I use an 18-year-old laptop.