Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pwdisswordfish6

pwdisswordfish6

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 01, 2021, 5:26 PM UTC
HN karma
135
Public activity
70 items

About pwdisswordfish6

The HN rules still apply.

Please do not be disrespectful toward others.

Separate the commenter from the comment.

Smart commenters still make dumb comments now and then. And vice versa.

Consequently, the "identity" of the commenter is not a reliable predictor of the quality of the comment.

Shared accounts such as this one can address this problem.

Each comment must stand on its own, apart from identity and historical karma.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #26716686

    Fortunately, although it is pay-to-play, it's not pay-to-win. Oracle (or any other well-heeled player) can spend half a million or more in legal fees trying to go after a small com…

  2. comment
    Comment #26646368

    That marks attempt #3 here at begging the question.

  3. comment
    Comment #26643128

    This is the second instance of an attempt on your part to use circular reasoning so that it might be impossible to argue with you. It's clear now that you're just here for the conf…

  4. comment
    Comment #26643082

    The remark "you might want to reconsider whether your powers of self-diagnosis" is not using "consider" in the same sense that I used it in the comment you're replying to. You are …

  5. comment
    Comment #26642935

    > I never said that I know . I said it. Why am I having to repeat this? > what part of your description was condescending What? I'm not saying my description was condescending. It …

  6. comment
    Comment #26640537

    Two straightforward questions. You already dodged one when it was framed as an observation; I'll repeat it again as an explicit question. 1. Do you think that your comment https://…

  7. comment
    Comment #26640417

    You're right, it's my quote--where I gave an inline description about what was condescending about it. Since you asked, I repeated it.

  8. comment
    Comment #26633509

    > how to human

  9. comment
    Comment #26633500

    > Given that you felt the need to say that, you might want to reconsider[...] You're responding to an anonymous comment on a message board with zero IRL context. Consider your own …

  10. comment
    Comment #26633474

    Actual problem: not understanding the distinction between a bug report and form meant for "asking others to do something for you".

  11. comment
    Comment #26629908

    You're pointing to cases to invalidate the claim as if that claim was supposed to be interpreted to be bracketed by a universal quantifier. It wasn't, and arguing in that way is no…

  12. comment
    Comment #26629656

    So you're doubling down on condescendingly explaining how to human. Cool. Consider this: I have a high emotional IQ and acutely understand whatever lesson you think you're impartin…

  13. comment
    Comment #26629528

    I'll note that you didn't start your response here with pleasantries, and no one else has, either. By leaping at the opportunity to condescendingly explain human behavior, you've s…

  14. comment
    Comment #26627515

    Strong disagreement from here. I don't want that kind of stuff in bug reports for the same reason that I don't want to have to deal with "hello", "good morning", from coworkers in …

  15. comment
    Comment #26609273

    No, you're done. > language that's already ~30 years old by now Relevance?

  16. comment
    Comment #26606355

    Sounds like a double standard and possibly moving the goalposts. There are strongly typed languages that don't have those features, and compiler codebases that don't use that kind …

  17. comment
    Comment #26606163

    You know all those jokes that people like Linus make about Real Programmers—the ones who have hair on their chests, etc—you know those are all jokes , right? Jokes in the laughing-…

  18. comment
    Comment #26606049

    Write a compiler in a strongly typed language, and then remove all the type annotations. This may come as a shock, but this is what a compiler (or any codebase) could look like whe…

  19. comment
    Comment #26597534

    You are limited to one *.neocities.org site, otherwise it's $60 per year.

  20. comment
    Comment #26587659

    > I swear I didn't see factories-making-factories-making-factories until that thing was published No? That's a pretty good description of the sort of metaprogramming that Lisp give…

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #26262622

    Google Reader ≠ RSS.

  23. comment
    Comment #26262589

    Hacker News was never good.

  24. comment
    Comment #26261670

    You must be new here to expect Hacker News to read an article before commenting.

  25. comment
    Comment #26248140

    That’s right. I use an 18-year-old laptop.