Viewing profile — pwdisswordfish5
pwdisswordfish5
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Dec 26, 2020, 7:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 117
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pwdisswordfish5
Please do not be disrespectful toward others.
Separate the commenter from the comment.
Smart commenters still make dumb comments now and then. And vice versa.
Consequently, the "identity" of the commenter is not a reliable predictor of the quality of the comment.
Shared accounts such as this one can address this problem.
Each comment must stand on its own, apart from identity and historical karma.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25980446
> Basically you want free beer like Linux? Get a distribution from OpenJDK. After the Oracle lawsuit, why should people feel safe believing that Oracle will respect the terms of th…
-
comment
Comment #25876802
> With an internal repository, everyone in your enterprise will be able to view the Page with the same credentials they use to login to github.com Public service announcement: "log…
-
comment
Comment #25872406
I thought this was obvious.
-
comment
Comment #25862758
> You can see the running version at https://bitchin.net > 502 Bad Gateway Yeah, it’s written in V.
-
comment
Comment #25853603
Scott McNealy, under direct examination on 2012 April 26: "you can't license GPL code and then resell it for a profit" Source: Official Reporters for the US District Court for the …
-
comment
Comment #25851930
Just like your last message[1], the answer is "but why male models?" (in other words, I just answered that[2]; do you want me to repeat it[3] or something?) 1. https://news.ycombin…
-
comment
Comment #25849084
This is a perplexing response. Oracle's case against Google is about copyright infringement. On that point, you are correct, but that's where your comments part from reality. Oracl…
-
comment
Comment #25848980
It's like we're not even having the same conversation. McNealy, founder of Sun, testified under oath that GPL doesn't permit commercial use. What was unclear about this the first t…
-
comment
Comment #25848757
https://xkcd.com/774/
-
comment
Comment #25846743
This comment is playing fast and loose with the facts. No part of Oracle's suit against Google relied on the claim that "Java wasn't open-source at the time Google copied it" (for …
-
comment
Comment #25846415
There's no reason to think that you're safe even if it were Apache-licensed. One of the things that was made clear in Oracle v. Google is that Oracle effectively treats litigation …
-
comment
Comment #25845801
This is an argument about checked indexing, not about where indexing should start; after all, whatever the index base, you still need to check that the index fits within the bounds…
-
comment
Comment #25845464
But zero is an https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_number_(mathematics) . The unintuitive step is apparently identifying the index with the cardinality of the collection from bef…
-
comment
Comment #25845061
Zero- versus one-based indexing actually matters somewhat for correctness. The real trivial ‘small syntactic technical’ bikeshedding is braces versus indentation (and: which kind o…
-
comment
Comment #25844972
I don’t know why 1-based-indexing supporters insist on pointing out this distinction. Whenever one indexes some kind of a map with numbers – and it actually matters that they are n…
-
comment
Comment #25844887
> But we don't need to rely on Dijkstra's opinion at all. I don’t. I refer to Dijkstra’s opinion because it happens to coincide with my opinion, it’s already written down, and it w…
-
comment
Comment #25831171
IDDQD, IDKFA and I'm in.
-
comment
Comment #25822757
It comes with the territory; aiding you in the quest for cool is one of GitHub's only value propositions. Because it's certainly not about productivity. People substitute having a …
-
comment
Comment #25737055
It's partially related the webmail-vs-IMAP problem: direct access and control over your data. An example: There is a pending suit that will ultimately be settled with an insurance …
-
comment
Comment #25603888
Right, there’s still the photorealistic CGI version to be made.
-
comment
Comment #25588782
This is nothing more than apologetics, and not even good apologetics. Instead, speculative apologetics, i.e. no solid footing by which to understand the premise.
-
comment
Comment #25588137
> I genuinely have no idea what point you are trying to make. The point, as already stated, is that people who were official mouthpieces for Mozilla said for years that the default…
-
comment
Comment #25588119
Pfft, please. The staff cuts are among the least offensive things done under the Mozilla name. Much more value was created earlier by unpaid volunteers who were rewarded by having …
-
comment
Comment #25587710
> in 2015 Mozilla negotiated a deal with Yahoo netting them an additional $100+ million ... after spending years saying that the relationship with Google regarding search royalties…
-
comment
Comment #25587577
Once upon a time, someone affiliated with Thunderbird project maintenance/governance posted a detailed reply to HN describing how hard it was to get Mozilla to release funds that i…