Viewing profile — purpledove
purpledove
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 08, 2010, 8:09 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 9
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About purpledove
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #1859239
The implication being that he is too good to waste his time on math.
-
comment
Comment #1840654
I can't take this seriously - blaming an individual, especially a CEO, for destroying a corporate culture is ridiculous. I know essentially nothing about the history of HP, but wha…
-
comment
Comment #1814186
Please see Dennis M. Ritchie's short bio: http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/bigbio1st.html He has deep mathematical talent. Ken Thompson also has deep analytical abilities as d…
-
comment
Comment #1801087
Clojure, like Lisp, has terrible syntax that is difficult for human beings to read. This is one of the reasons the academic community kept Lisp alive - independence from industry, …
-
comment
Comment #1799847
I'm 30, and I've worked at various corporations, both small and large, for 5 years. I've never once been told "I can't do things". Not once. Rather the opposite - I've worked with …
-
comment
Comment #1799691
All of the fears he mentions are present all of the time when coding - fear of working on the wrong thing, fear of not being able to solve problem X, etc... Those fears are healthy…
-
comment
Comment #1758669
This is an excellent suggestion. Other suggestions: read the wikipedia articles on Simple LR and General LR parsers; google "python descriptor" and read the top results.
-
comment
Comment #1711817
I fail to see how Chris was a "casualty of the system". I have a little trouble buying his stated desire to transfer to a vocational school for training mechanics...in any city the…
-
comment
Comment #1663538
Oh wow, overload. Tempted to leach, but... Anyway, here is a recommendation: 2006.03.26 - This is a good long mix I listened to many times.
-
comment
Comment #1663524
I agree - there is a vagueness issue with the rule, and it is not obviously falsifiable. But as stated, the rule does not discuss unpublished works - it is a statement about publis…
-
comment
Comment #1663511
Quite right - he goes in the second list.
-
comment
Comment #1663490
The equal-odds rule is simply wrong. A few examples: Andrew Wiles, Charles Darwin, John Forbes Nash. These people produced a small amount of work, but they shook the earth. Some pe…
-
comment
Comment #1663127
It wasn't a comparison of companies, it was a rebuke of Microsoft's leadership. The criticism is certainly valid, and all the more convincing because Microsoft HAS shipped high-qua…
-
comment
Comment #1604608
Speaking of evil, let us not forget Goldman Sach's treatment of Sergey Aleynikov. Makes Oracle look like Mother Teresa.
-
comment
Comment #1602594
She is saying that the start-up mythology of success, which is vital to keeping up the spirits of the best of us, can lead the good-but-not-great astray in their lives. She is sayi…
-
comment
Comment #1585045
I recommend A. K. Dewdney's "The New Turing Omnibus". It is a series of articles and is very easy to dip into.