Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — publicmenace

publicmenace

HN member
Joined
Sun, Apr 02, 2023, 9:41 PM UTC
HN karma
5
Public activity
28 items

About publicmenace

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #35443880

    You leftists are really something to behold. Undeterred by facts, I'm sure you will continue to spread bullshit on this website and refuse to acknowledge your errors.

  3. comment
    Comment #35435225

    [flagged]

  4. comment
    Comment #35435103

    Tesla's earnings have absolutely nothing to do with how much this guy deserves to get.

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #35435091

    [flagged]

  7. comment
    Comment #35434876

    [flagged]

  8. comment
    Comment #35434860

    [flagged]

  9. comment
    Comment #35434834

    Yes. Punitive damages are not appropriate to begin with in this case, and certainly not that high.

  10. comment
    Comment #35434823

    Lol if you made any of these arguments to a lawyer they'd laugh at you. That's not how damages are supposed to work, not at all.

  11. comment
    Comment #35434713

    [flagged]

  12. comment
    Comment #35434680

    [flagged]

  13. comment
    Comment #35434677

    [flagged]

  14. comment
    Comment #35434674

    [flagged]

  15. comment
    Comment #35434649

    [flagged]

  16. comment
    Comment #35434620

    [flagged]

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #35434559

    [flagged]

  19. comment
    Comment #35434504

    [flagged]

  20. comment
    Comment #35424753

    There was nothing in the rules prohibiting the terminal price. And the letter of course says that. That doesn’t mean it’s their real motive or a correct conclusion.

  21. comment
    Comment #35424654

    > if this was some kind of stunt pulled by the FCC, SpaceX can sue. but in reality, this was exactly by the book and SpaceX accepted it Again wrong. SpaceX in fact has already appe…

  22. comment
    Comment #35424519

    No this is not the same thing they’ve done for decades. You just make that assertion but it’s not true. It’s not some crazy conspiracy. This is the whole point of winning elections…

  23. comment
    Comment #35423643

    > the fcc is allowed to take their money back if your service is going in a downward trend. That’s not quite right. They can take it if they conclude you will not meet the target .…

  24. comment
    Comment #35423286

    Because that’s how the RDOF program was designed. You have a number of years to meet your targets in exchange for the subsidies to help you do it.

  25. comment
    Comment #35418912

    They didn't have to meet any performance targets until 2024 at the earliest so that was a bogus justification. They were fairly close but were cutting performance a bit to reach mo…