Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ptx

ptx

HN member
Joined
Wed, Oct 16, 2013, 12:19 PM UTC
HN karma
5,215
Public activity
2,121 items

About ptx

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #49230003

    More concretely, Microsoft's license [0] gives you at most one of the four essential freedoms: 0. Freedom to run for any purpose? No. 1. Freedom to modify the program? Maybe; Micro…

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #49200626

    Does Codeberg support Windows runners at all? Forgejo only seems to have unofficial third-party builds of the Forgejo Actions runner for Windows.

  5. comment
    Comment #49199610

    Are there any other CI providers that offer free cloud-hosted Windows runners? Or has Microsoft made sure (through Windows licensing terms and pricing) that it's not possible to co…

  6. comment
    Comment #49155738

    Or maybe they didn't train it that way to be manipulative (although it's certainly a plausible explanation) but simply as an accidental artifact of trying to make it give honest an…

  7. comment
    Comment #49155424

    This does make some sense if it's considered a valid fix to document that you have verified that Bluetooth is disabled on the servers and therefore not vulnerable. But that assumes…

  8. comment
    Comment #49153656

    Wow, their Java code example [0] makes COBOL look elegant and terse by comparison. [0] https://community.ibm.com/community/user/blogs/gregory-cerne...

  9. comment
    Comment #49128319

    What do you mean? Their package manager allows you to add additional repositories, if that's what you want.

  10. comment
    Comment #49117568

    Doesn't GitHub do this already? If I force push the PR branch, the PR shows a message about this with a link to diff it against the previous version.

  11. comment
    Comment #49108475

    This is the guy, if I'm not mistaken, who was fired for telling different groups people different and contradictory lies depending on what he needed them to believe. And now he's t…

  12. comment
    Comment #49096879

    Well, yes. That LLMs are unable to distinguish instructions from data is a well-known and unsolved problem with LLMs in general. This is one of the reasons it would be completely i…

  13. comment
    Comment #49082928

    Calculon: And you say you can guarantee me the Oscar? Bender: I can guarantee anything you want. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGZ10kZ4lmE

  14. comment
    Comment #49080635

    Python lets you bundle all the modules in a zip file and run that (no third-party tools needed): https://docs.python.org/3/library/zipapp.html

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #49067192

    This convenience sounds a little dangerous. Would this allow the user to specify e.g. joins or SQL procedure calls using the query parameter?

  17. comment
    Comment #49067144

    How is this different from any other language? Python can also make apps for all those platforms, either with native UIs or cross-platform UIs. There are many options. Are you talk…

  18. comment
    Comment #49067108

    .NET also comes with "telemetry" built-in that sends your data to Microsoft without asking for your consent: https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/issues/6145 I wouldn't want to run softwa…

  19. comment
    Comment #49057115

    Exactly. This is like proposing to solve memory safety by asking programmers to simply not make any mistakes. Simply specify that "the contributor should verify" that the code has …

  20. comment
    Comment #49052161

    That was my first reaction as well. The author seems very confused about it. He starts off defining it as something that is unknown or secret, and more specifically, he goes on to …

  21. comment
    Comment #49050716

    That would make sense if they hadn't first taken away the user's ability to control their own device directly. Some people were OK with that because users could still use this hack…

  22. comment
    Comment #49037733

    Shouldn't the core provided by this JEP be a streaming API then, so that you can build whatever you need on top of it? But they specifically exclude that from the goals.

  23. comment
    Comment #48999061

    This is not new, and it's weird that this blog post doesn't acknowledge that. A a snapshot from 2017 [0] of their docs show the UI for this very feature. A snapshot from 2023 of th…

  24. comment
    Comment #48992736

    It made perfect sense to me, FWIW. Paintings, sculptures, blog posts, HN comments, etc. are all examples of different things that can be reductively viewed as "content" by those wh…

  25. comment
    Comment #48977551

    Right, that's the sort of thing I meant. As you read it, you would naturally try to understand why the author used such profound-sounding prose in that particular part of the text.…