Viewing profile — ptoo
ptoo
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 17, 2021, 12:13 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 53
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ptoo
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46344030
Exactly. >Share everything to the world, and let everyone make their own judgement based on what they see? What's the alternative to this? They don't share all the information with…
-
comment
Comment #39390843
There will always be things humans can do that AI cannot. And if there ever comes a point when that's not the case, there will be no need to distinguish the two.
-
comment
Comment #39075835
I'm leaning towards there being no causation between skin microbiome and wrinkles. Did anyone in the study have botox? Crow's feet wrinkles are generally caused by two things: UV d…
-
comment
Comment #37336929
I was hoping to do this as a project. The issue I had was having access to a database of all books with an ISBN, or which books to include.
-
comment
Comment #36245705
People have tried to create alternatives to Reddit numerous times over previous controversies. It never sticks. I don't see this time being different.
-
comment
Comment #35368100
The premise isn't exactly that people shouldn't select for traits that they desire, rather that it is irresponsible for journalism and other forms of media to make allusions to hei…
-
comment
Comment #35365905
Sure, some forms of intelligence or other personal qualities could be opted for when choosing a mate. Should inconsequential physical traits such as race and height? You tell me. O…
-
comment
Comment #35365714
To me, that's even further evidence that both race and height are totally inconsequential. That fact that these things can bestow social advantages is no reason to view either of t…
-
comment
Comment #35365695
I'm not implying anything about the biological racial differences between humans. When I say racism, I'm talking about people of colour who experience prejudice based on the colour…
-
comment
Comment #35365579
I think we can ignore the outlier of basketball players playing at the highest level. We could also point to CEO's of Fortune 500 companies and their races but that shouldn't lead …
-
comment
Comment #35365497
That's a good corroboration of my point that height being a positive characteristic is largely cultural/societal and of no true importance as it relates to a person's worth.
-
comment
Comment #35365473
The majority of women, especially before we began to actually combat racism, would also agree that being white is preferable, as would black men who were subjected to the results o…
-
comment
Comment #35365443
My point doesn't relate to whether rural or urban children become taller. Height is largely genetic, and discounting malnutrition it has no bearing on a person's health. Shorter pe…
-
comment
Comment #35365383
Again, substitute the "socially beneficial" arbitrary trait of height for race and ask yourself if that sounds acceptable. Should people opt for white children simply because racis…
-
comment
Comment #35365356
Height certainly exists, but it has no bearing on a person's worth, despite what this article or society at large would have you believe.
-
comment
Comment #35365349
Why does it matter if they reach their full possible height, barring health complications? At least 80% of height is genetic so creating a value system based upon something that ha…
-
comment
Comment #35365276
Using the terminology of children turning out slightly "better" in cities in the context of height is slightly distasteful, even though it is societally quite prevalent. Height is …
-
comment
Comment #34940099
Re the AppleCare+ point. If you are unlikely to break a screen more frequently than every 2 years on average, it's more economical to just not get the service. This is ignoring oth…
- story
-
comment
Comment #34254593
Could you elaborate on Sapiens' anti-human bent? I was going to get around to starting it soon.
-
comment
Comment #33852993
This comment is nonsensical, it genuinely feels like it was written by GPT-3
- comment
-
comment
Comment #32798454
My solution was to generate random sentences in my head. I then iterate through the letters of each sentence, and if the letter is M or later in the alphabet, I select right. If th…
-
comment
Comment #32626851
How do you reconcile point 1 with the fact that atheists on average have higher IQ's than non-atheists?
-
comment
Comment #31060242
But every trait or behaviour that survives on evolutionary timescales does serve (or did serve, in the case of vestigial features) a purpose. I'm not sure what the exact mechanism …