Viewing profile — psyopsy
psyopsy
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 03, 2024, 3:43 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 15
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About psyopsy
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46367633
They're not contradictory in a vacuum. But in this sequence, they show you're backpedaling. You opened with a firm claim, and when confronted with actual data, you retreated to 'we…
-
comment
Comment #46367452
Happily accusing without evidence? Not shocking behavior. What's shocking is to just say it out loud. LMAO. Funny how "believe women" stops applying when their choices contradict y…
-
comment
Comment #46341502
You started with “not well explained by biology.” All of the evidence is solidly on one side, so you’ve retreated to “we can neither confirm nor deny.” I guess that’s progress?
-
comment
Comment #46341475
Low bar to accuse. High bar to retract. Classic.
-
comment
Comment #46331007
Shhhhhh… don’t spoil their little hate party. Everyone knows that the whole marketing team really wanted to include every employee’s name in the 90 sec trailer, but Jon said, “abso…
-
comment
Comment #46330979
He ruffles the very sensitive Internet dwellers who have all correct beliefs. Many years ago, during the peak growth of internet cancel culture, Jon made the mistake of saying an u…
-
comment
Comment #46330877
I’ve never seen a thread so reflective of this meme: “It's amazing how much leftist discourse is just them pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible.”
-
comment
Comment #46330799
Am I supposed to be embarrassed for defending someone against a baseless smear? Anyway, call it "defensive" all you want. It doesn't change the historical thread: You argued, at be…
-
comment
Comment #46330700
Congrats! You've made your position unfalsifiable. When the data consistently shows gaps widening as social strictures loosen, and your response is to blame an invisible, unmeasura…
-
comment
Comment #46327344
They did try to account for social conditioning: parents' education and jobs, local labor markets, school performance, the whole bit. The gap still didn't move much. If socializati…
-
comment
Comment #46326757
You said, "I don't think he's said exactly that in his own words but..." That's implicitly saying, "well, he hasn't admitted it outright, but yeah, he basically believes it." Now f…
-
comment
Comment #46320319
Half his employees are women—including leadership, programming, and creative roles. If that doesn’t count as “thinking women have a role,” what would? 51%? 90%? You’re relying on b…
-
comment
Comment #46320223
Sex is the strongest single predictor of vocational interest orientation we’ve found. Nothing else comes close. If that’s not ‘explained by biology,’ you need to tell me what would…
-
comment
Comment #46320082
Gravity isn’t fully understood either. Guess we can’t say things fall down.
-
comment
Comment #46320034
Little bro read the paper title and no further. That study found that when you test 14 monkeys alone in cages where they can’t actually move the toys, you don’t see the same sex di…
-
comment
Comment #46318314
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46318148
LOL. You're going to dismiss the study because of the justification for doing the study. Here, let me help you understand: "not fully understood" -> "so we studied it" -> "here's w…
-
comment
Comment #46317266
Thekla currently has 10 core permanent employees. 5 of them are women, including their studio manager, creative and art Director, a programmer, and 2 additional artists. You can sa…
-
comment
Comment #46317151
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46317026
When you say, "not well support by evidence," you're either wrong, anti-science, or lying. Numerous studies absolutely show very large average differences in interests based on sex…
-
comment
Comment #41727222
Why sad? If he defrauded the government, he’s got bigger problems than losing a trademark.
-
comment
Comment #41727195
[flagged]