Viewing profile — psnj
psnj
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 08, 2009, 12:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 130
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About psnj
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #2076296
> But I notice that the only people that really hate it are powerusers. This is an excellent point. If I write network clients in elisp just for yuks, I'm probably not Apple's targ…
-
comment
Comment #2075344
Vigorously agree. I have no idea why I have such a hard time using iTunes, but I do consistently, even doing really simple and obvious things. It horrifies me.
-
comment
Comment #2031634
I was surprised by my almost-panicky reaction to seeing: Identifiers Can Have Blanks open_window_with_attributes(...) becomes: open window with attributes (...) I think I actually …
-
comment
Comment #1984346
I used to work at OT when Glazer was there, and I attended a workshop once where he gave a talk. Very impressive guy -- I remember thinking "I want to work for the company that guy…
-
comment
Comment #1709508
I think the "diamond test" is useful and elegant in its simplicity: a woman that requires a diamond to marry you is the wrong woman.
-
comment
Comment #1687045
I say "sequel" ("s-q-l" hardly rolls off the tongue) but often in my group we call it "skewl", because in addition to shaving off half the syllables of "sequel", it sounds fittingl…
- story
-
comment
Comment #1634785
Funny, that pulsing light drives me nuts. If I'm in a darkened room with my MBP, I have to cover it or turn it to face the other way.
-
comment
Comment #1626968
> [...] there isn't such a thing as happiness. > Misery and pain is part and parcel of being alive and that's the way it should be. Is it not possible that there is happiness, but …
-
comment
Comment #1328731
I've always found this an interesting topic, and once in a while it's interesting to discuss it with someone who believes in a god. Sometimes I wonder how much we choose what we be…
-
comment
Comment #1302624
Although it is a bit goddy for my tastes, I've always liked the Ritual Calling of the Engineer and the Iron Ring that goes with it, which is unusual because I'm certainly not one f…
-
comment
Comment #1246347
I think this is great advice. I've been in some dark corners myself, and the parent comment resonated with me, especially: * It seems like you're the only one dealing with this, bu…
-
comment
Comment #1198725
A startup in the co-working space I'm in is addressing this very problem: http://www.zeebu.com/ They create smartphone games for little kids. Twenty-first century pacifiers? Appare…
-
comment
Comment #1078802
No mention of the "geeksnort"?
-
comment
Comment #997043
> Can you show me some statistics to prove that this > (junk mail) works? One could argue that it must be effective, as it's expensive to print and post mail, yet marketers have be…
-
comment
Comment #926642
> Checking parameters in every method (especially an OO system) is a sure way to have poor performance. This seems overly general to me. I'm not sure it's a "sure way to have poor …
-
comment
Comment #925383
> 1. If you are going to assert these things, don't do it in the middle of the method - do it in a place that makes sense (start of the method). Sure, I can see that -- assertions …
-
comment
Comment #924972
Could someone explain: "Be Defensive - They're out to Get Your Code! - Defensively assert about the state of parameters passed in methods, constructors, and mid-method."? which, de…
-
comment
Comment #831267
It's in situations like that where you see flight attendants doing their "real" jobs.
-
comment
Comment #830547
Agree. When I was getting my pilot's license, I learned to be hyper-aware of another airplane that was less than say 1000 feet from me. But the strangest part of those lessons was …
-
comment
Comment #749349
Yes, you're right. I agree that there are times that denormalizing makes sense. My point was that the item said: * Throw away the normal forms you learned in school * Denormalize […
-
comment
Comment #749220
Some reasonable advice in there, but #3? Ruh roh.