Viewing profile — pryffwyd
pryffwyd
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 3:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 7
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pryffwyd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #21649344
If such fake universities exist, why aren't these resources being spent to identity and shutter them instead? If they don't, why manufacture this elaborate heist instead of deporti…
-
comment
Comment #21572220
It costs 100s of millions of dollars to animate and market a feature Pixar film. It would be very penny-wise/pound-foolish to try to skimp on voice-acting. Animated films will be t…
-
comment
Comment #21442258
Chicago citizens were on average murdered .0002 times in the last year
-
comment
Comment #21432272
34 months to pass, jesus. No wonder ridesharing is eating taxis' lunch.
-
comment
Comment #21409631
Agreed. They would only lose a fraction of the 0.5% anyway, since they would just run other ads in their place. This is all about Facebook controlling the political process.
-
comment
Comment #21345241
Definitely. Adding an extra grade I'm sure would require at least a couple hours of technical work and haunt subsystems and stats analysts for decades to come. Not worth it.
-
comment
Comment #21283187
The latest no-OOP imperative language with any kind of market share is C. So everything that's terrible about C: unsafe manual memory, portability issues, tooling, no generics or o…
-
comment
Comment #21264397
I have read that a study is very unlikely to replicate if p is juuust under 0.05, but very likely to replicate if just over 0.05. The first is a good sign of p hacking, while the s…
-
comment
Comment #21236520
It appears textually first but the evaluation order is the same as the classic ?: ternary. ```[][0] if False else 'foo'``` will not raise an IndexError.