Viewing profile — prvit
prvit
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 06, 2022, 8:17 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 879
- Public activity
- 621 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About prvit
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33806467
I'll just clear my cookies, change my VPN exit and continue posting. What's the point?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33795497
But that information isn’t public, it’s only visible to law enforcement. This is how company ownership information should be treated too.
-
comment
Comment #33794858
Because the Guardian says so.
-
comment
Comment #33794812
This is a solved problem, you can simply refuse to work with charities that don’t share such information.
-
comment
Comment #33794803
So? The name of that person doesn’t need to be public for the courts to be able to hold them accountable.
-
comment
Comment #33794330
I really can’t see how your interest in not doing business with companies owned by people you like could possibly outweigh every business owners privacy interests.
-
comment
Comment #33793805
When an individual has registered a car and is enjoying the right to operate a 6000 lbs death machine on public roads, why do they need their name hidden? What value in the society…
-
comment
Comment #33793754
Not at all. A company could be a one man shop which only does business with one other company, it’s not obvious why that would be more of a public activity than just being directly…
-
comment
Comment #33793200
Most companies probably do not own resources like land. What actual use do you have for this information? Beyond “it’s nice to know”? Is it not sufficient that you have a service a…
-
comment
Comment #33793180
Why is it any more of a public activity than working for a company?
-
comment
Comment #33793134
People do not start companies in Dubai instead of the EU because of paperwork, Dubai is particularly paperwork heavy (especially if you need a local bank account).
-
comment
Comment #33793090
> Why should business owners be anonymous? Why not? Generally EU countries do not like public lists of PII, why should business owners be treated differently? What legitimate use d…
-
comment
Comment #33792355
I’ll offer a different take here. More than 99% of the people whose information is listed in these registries are not corrupt public officials, Russian oligarchs, or [insert person…
-
comment
Comment #33786849
Because there is no “client list”.
-
comment
Comment #33771300
Go on https://www.rtings.com/ and buy any decent OLED TV. Solves this problem entirely. HDR can help if you’re watching HDR content, which most new content is starting to be.
-
comment
Comment #33745435
I didn’t forget what I wrote, I just exist in the real world where missiles are a bigger threat than hackers.
-
comment
Comment #33743792
These are criminals, they can install microsoft office and create fake proof of purchase. Completely pointless idea.
-
comment
Comment #33743774
> They aren't suffering more than poor. But they are suffering more than they would if given the ability to post bail.
-
comment
Comment #33740352
> So what you are basically saying is that poor people should suffer more for committing the same crime as someone rich. Do you believe that rich people should suffer more because …
-
comment
Comment #33739806
> the expectation is that they apply reasonable effort to doing so, including demonstrating a response to publicly known incidents of crime rings operating on their site. Again, ru…
-
comment
Comment #33739728
It’s literally impossible to sell goods from third parties at scale without inevitably accepting stolen goods. There’s no amount of vetting that could solve this. > "We run such a …
-
comment
Comment #33739706
> Every US state that I'm aware of makes it a crime to knowingly receive stolen property For mens rea you’d need to know that the specific property you are receiving is stolen. Not…
- comment