Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — prucomaclu

prucomaclu

HN member
Joined
Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 10:23 AM UTC
HN karma
-16
Public activity
27 items

About prucomaclu

I find it ironic how I'm being down-voted and ultimately censored due to karma-based rate-limits, in a thread about censorship.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #25666135

    I do believe the election was stolen. This is because I have yet to see any honest attempt to refute the claims that have been made. Refutations in the media generally boil down to…

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #25412532

    As one example, the Michigan case King v Whitmer: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905... https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905... In…

  4. comment
    Comment #25405493

    > A majority vote within Texas cannot deprive any in the minority of the protection of the US Constitution In a lot of people's opinions, that ship sailed long ago. The Constitutio…

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #25390804

    > And I'm sorry that you take this laughable stuff at face value. If you have just 2 minutes I would kindly request you play below video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZXkAv7yKg…

  7. comment
    Comment #25388139

    It's a sad state in America when judges dismiss legitimate claims as being "wild, nonsensical" for literally no reason except partisan politics, and 50% of the country is OK with t…

  8. comment
    Comment #25388002

    > You're missing a fundamental point: anyone can make wild, nonsensical claims. it is not for the judge to "refute" them, it is for the plaintiff to substantiate them. The affidavi…

  9. comment
    Comment #25381043

    The Trump campaign has stated a belief that this was organized from the top down. I am not in agreement with that. I do not think there was some conspiracy from the top to commit f…

  10. comment
    Comment #25380080

    Judge Kenny's judgement is below: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/... For the specific claim that we are discussing (poll challengers being kicked out a…

  11. comment
    Comment #25379201

    > For the specific claim made above (Biden and Trump both filled in, going to Biden), if I recall it was one of the witnesses during the Michigan legislature hearing. To follow up …

  12. comment
    Comment #25378946

    > Start by making a specific claim. Specific claim: During the counting at the TCF Center in Michigan, Republican poll watchers were denied their legal right to meaningful observat…

  13. comment
    Comment #25378695

    > And those judges were probably presented solid evidence that amounted to more than conspiracy and hand waving. The problem is, that many of the judges themselves are guilty of ha…

  14. comment
    Comment #25378097

    > It's up to the charlatans filing the frivolous lawsuits to "PROVE" their claims This is true. It is up to them to prove it. > I've already provided you with links and citations, …

  15. comment
    Comment #25377802

    Thanks for the links. I have reviewed the first link some weeks back. From what I can tell, the judgement falls under the "casual dismissal" category. Aside from the fact that the …

  16. comment
    Comment #25376001

    > The judge didn't see it that way: > "This court has no authority to take away the right to vote of even a single person, let alone millions of citizens." That's his opinion and h…

  17. comment
    Comment #25375672

    For an executive summary of the evidence available, the Texas lawsuit is a good starting point (first 36 pages). https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/ima... For…

  18. comment
    Comment #25374580

    Maybe it just seems this way, but it seems like it's been a very long time since a US President has not started any new wars. I agree with you - it is a point in his favor that he'…

  19. comment
    Comment #25374462

    > All you've proven is that you're "unquestioning", which is why you're parroting disproven lies. I have not seen any evidence that these claims have been "disproven". I would be v…

  20. comment
    Comment #25374256

    For the specific claim made above (Biden and Trump both filled in, going to Biden), if I recall it was one of the witnesses during the Michigan legislature hearing. For your other …

  21. comment
    Comment #25373933

    > Don't be ridiculous. No other president has ever tried to overturn the results of an election like Trump. He's trying to overturn the election, yes. Through the legal system. Isn…

  22. comment
    Comment #25373634

    In Michigan, based on testimony/affidavits: 1) The poll workers were almost exclusively Democrats. 2) It was only Republican poll watchers who were being thrown out 3) Republican p…

  23. comment
    Comment #25372767

    In reply to sibling post by DonHopkins > "I'm not racist, but [racist shit]..." "I don't mean to be rude, but [rude shit]..." "I'm not a Trump supporter, but [parrots Trump's lies]…

  24. comment
    Comment #25372597

    > unable to point to anything convincing? It's pretty well documented that poll watchers were denied their lawful right of meaningful observation. The counter-claim to this is that…

  25. comment
    Comment #25372544

    I'm not defending Trump. He's a terrible person. But, to me, he's not much worse than other Presidents. Other Presidents have started wars. Tortured people. Persecuted whistleblowe…