Viewing profile — proto-n

yeah well, both the doomers and the "pr stunt" folks are right - openai wanted to prove, as a pr stunt, that they have a dangerous weapon - openai proved (as a pr stunt), that they…

From Gemini pro: You should definitely ride the elephant (or at least lead it there)! Here is the logic: If you walk there by yourself, you will arrive at the creek, but the dirty …

1. "Suspected" is just that, suspected, you can't penalize papers based on your gut feel 2. LLM-s are a tool, and there's nothing wrong with using them unless you misuse them

Well, one of these is something that most reaonable people work on avoiding, while the other is something that a huge capitalist industrial machine is working to achieve like their…

And along similar lines, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."

I really don't see why it's not possible to just use basically a "highlighter" token which is added to all the authoritative instructions and not to data. Should be very fast for t…

Not exactly. You can't steal anything unless the person revealed the public key. Addresses are just hashes of public keys, therefore qc resistant. However, you can't ever reuse an …

I still disagree. It's more like "omg I should have published at least a few papers by now, what am I doing" and then you start frantically looking for provable things in the datas…

It's really not that hard to come up with ways to commit fraud if you want to. On the other hand, it's very easy to make such mistakes if you don't know to avoid them. This charact…

Not only common, it's become a requirement to review papers if you submit one yourself. Yeah it's not ideal for multiple reasons (what you said + prompt engineering grad students d…

"For the first time, researchers reading conference proceedings will be forced to wonder: does this work truly merit my attention? Or is its publication simply the result of fraud?…

The "so called Long COVID" really just means "I got covid and I remain unwell in some way, long term". I'm not sure it needs to be questioned if those two qualifying things are giv…

(Wasn't me claiming that, read usernames) Yeah, but you are, at least seemingly, missing the point: the scripts he was referring to in context weren't the legal disclosures but the…

The article states that he was fired because the company had financial problems, and not reading the required stuff was used as an excuse

But then this is also an argument against spontaneous emergence of life, right? Sicne mirror-life could just emerge on its own, instead of evolving from regular life.

It seems you only want to call MVC frameworks frameworks? But there's millions of other types of frameworks for thousands of purposes. Framework is a generic term (for which the de…

Usually means uncertainty quantification

I really really hope you are a better judge of that than I am

Now this one makes more sense. Chemistry Nobel for advancing chemistry using AI. Contrast that with Phyics Nobel for advancing AI using physics.

I'm not sure forking the repo would create a forked version of the 'software' if the fork's sole purpose is to develop a pull request. But I guess it's somewhat ambiguous langauge,…

The same way any other illness is, I guess

To my (totally uninformed) eyes it looks like maybe this could count as a SLAPP suit [1], in which case there's a possbility for a counterclaim for legal costs. However, Massachuse…

I took the quote [1] to basically mean "we might think this is a nuclear warhead, but in fact it is not, rather it is some kind of random test object used to demonstrate the softwa…

He later finds basically the same object with the caption "The multiple components of a nuclear weapon body are highlighted in this intentionally simplified mesh" from another publ…

See for example GitHub's statement [1] about no longer displaying a cookie banner. While ironically the blog still does display them, the main site doesn't. [1] https://github.blog…