Viewing profile — programmerpass
programmerpass
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 11, 2025, 5:28 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -9
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About programmerpass
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43106850
“ we would be arguing”? I wouldn’t. I would argue it should be illegal for the police, media, and others who have significant roles in society to lie and that they should be crimin…
-
comment
Comment #43105397
What is “pro-47”?
-
comment
Comment #43099197
MSM is corrupt. That was the point. It does not matter the side.
-
comment
Comment #43098343
The reason Chevron likely compelled the Executive Order, at least in part, is because the Trump administration likely views the ability for agencies to self-resolve ambiguities in …
-
comment
Comment #43098229
Chevron was outrageous from purely a legal perspective. Chevron likely caused this Executive Order and rightfully so.
-
comment
Comment #43098138
This would apply only to the 15 executive departments — the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing …
-
comment
Comment #43098056
Fascinating that Trump doesn’t even come close to breaking the record. Does anyone know what the majority of the Executive Orders related to for the high-volume presidents and if t…
-
comment
Comment #43096497
Agreed
-
comment
Comment #43096494
Well, it’s going to have to pass the Elon Misk audit now. Bless his efforts.
-
comment
Comment #43096457
This is definitely not accurate.
-
comment
Comment #43096448
You need to be vibe checked.
-
comment
Comment #43094949
Most people, based on my experience, would rather support Elon Musk than support a strategy recommended by an individual who believes that the MSM should be trusted. Not to mention…
-
comment
Comment #43045298
Great question. I don’t have a good answer. Could a be a “facts and circumstances” type of legislation similar to the IRS. Many IRS rules go back to the “facts and circumstances” o…
-
comment
Comment #43044425
If an activity is profitable but the government can prosecute you for taking place in that activity, there in no correlation. That’s the point. Advertising was dangerous because th…
-
comment
Comment #43044340
The inverse: ensure companies that are already working with companies are not leaving them for illegitimate reasons.
-
comment
Comment #43044265
There should be a law in place whereby if you a prove a company was engaged in profitable advertising or activities and stopped doing those activities in response to political stan…
-
comment
Comment #43044236
Agreed.
-
comment
Comment #43044218
It was profitable to do so a year ago, it was simply dangerous politically. Now given Trump is in office and aligned with Musk, it’s politically beneficial. That seems to be the tr…
-
comment
Comment #42969056
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42968929
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42955683
“The survey highlights two interesting facts: 46% of tech employees have noticed an increase in DEI investments in 2020, and 51% companies now report on DEI metrics. However, the r…
-
comment
Comment #42955329
Well, if businesses had to prove that each hire is related to dei, which was the previous state of affairs, many would argue that is when evil creeps into business culture. So, it …
-
comment
Comment #42667749
The CNBC piece omits details that other coverage has: “The trial resulted in jurors finding that while Toptal did everything of significance it was required to do under its contrac…