Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — primering

primering

HN member
Joined
Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 12:49 PM UTC
HN karma
309
Public activity
48 items

About primering

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45214966

    I think that summarizes it well. It's not 10x better that makes the risky bet of going into vendor lock from a VC-backed company worth it. Same issue with Prisma and Next for me.

  2. comment
    Comment #44935726

    No, that is exactly what an ORM is, plus mapping it back. Anything around that is additional toolings that no ORM needs to be ORM, but is nonetheless usefull.

  3. comment
    Comment #44935713

    Yeah it's funny they even mention ORM while at the same offering something that has nothing to do with ORMs at all. Yes, many ORM libraries offer additional tools like migration an…

  4. comment
    Comment #44935691

    Well said. Please never be silent over this fact. It's important to educate people on what an ORM is, what it means and especially what it doesn't mean. Especially in times where V…

  5. comment
    Comment #44931400

    > you won’t see anything like this that compiles to javascript https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/47658

  6. comment
    Comment #44931386

    That is the real reason we get a less feature-rich TypeScript in the future and Node not supporting full TypeScript. Because they want to be supported by browser.

  7. comment
    Comment #44931335

    > I think this is a great step in the right direction by node I think it's the opposite. It will be a net negative, since people will now run TS by default without type checking. W…

  8. comment
    Comment #44931297

    Yes, they regret them because they hinder adoptions. Why? Because nobody chose to add TSC with all features in their runtime because TSC is extremely slow. They know they can skyro…

  9. comment
    Comment #44931263

    There is always a compile step (JS -> Bytecode -> Machine code). The question is only if it is visible to you or not. They could have made it totally transparent to you by fully su…

  10. comment
    Comment #44931227

    This is misleading. It is not transpiling TS in JS, it is transpiling a subset of TS into JS. If my normal TS code can not be "executed" by Node, then it is not executing TS per de…

  11. comment
    Comment #44931212

    Except it doesn't. In anything serious, you have to wait for a full type check to happen before you run your TS code. Why would you run code that has not been checked yet and could…

  12. comment
    Comment #44931188

    > because I find it's useful How useful is it exactly that you accept to not use DX improving syntax like constructor properties, enums, etc? To me, someone who uses these features…

  13. comment
    Comment #44931159

    It's not able to execute TypeScript, but a subset of it. The claim in the title is misleading if not totally wrong. This will unfortunately drive people towards using TS only as a …

  14. comment
    Comment #42962965

    you are probably right, but you know it's just that I really want to have a crazy fast typescript checker myself but can not justify the work when I know either nobody else will us…

  15. story
    Ask HN: Would you pay for 100x faster TypeScript type checker?

    As the title says, would the benefit of having a let's say ~100x faster TypeScript type checking be so great that you'd pay for it? If so, how much? I'm currently evaluating whethe…

  16. comment
    Comment #41222192

    That's really cool! Would love to use it in my c++ projects. One thought that came to my mind: How is the performance? Could you render a relatively complex page at high frames per…

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #31743447

    It makes the types available in runtime. You can take a look at the current WIP version of the new upcoming Deepkit book which explains it in great detail: https://deepkit-book.her…

  19. comment
    Comment #31674877

    If people say this is a modern version of Spring Boot, then I'm all for it.

  20. comment
    Comment #31674503

    To be honest, I don't think NestJS is even remotely comparable to anything like Symfony/Laravel.

  21. comment
    Comment #31674497

    Serverless is being worked on. We indeed plan to be Laravel/Symfony/Spring boot in the TypeScript world. Time will tell if we will be successful.

  22. comment
    Comment #31674370

    I'm really bad at marketing, but I regularly tweet [0] and chat with the discord [1] community. I'm trying keep the followers up to date with the C++ typescript stuff. Feel free to…

  23. comment
    Comment #31674237

    thank you so much!

  24. comment
    Comment #31671859

    Can you explain why this gives headache to scale? I ask because it is designed to scale well.

  25. comment
    Comment #31671656

    Curious, why would this be related to Deno?