Viewing profile — prat
prat
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 03, 2009, 6:07 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,323
- Public activity
- 429 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About prat
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29789208
I am working towards solving the problem of diagnostic labs that will soon have to, or are already coping with excess testing capacity built up for covid testing, and trying to lev…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #3703451
Very generally speaking, any successful idea accumulates adulteration over time as it is overused and over-exploited. The number of high quality instances do not decrease but have …
- pollopt
-
pollopt
Comment #3529598
Yes
-
poll
Poll: Do you want start-up investing democratized?
Since the petition page (http://wefunder.com/petition) assumes you are for the argument, I wanted (them) to take a step back and first democratize the decision of petitioning itsel…
-
comment
Comment #3529516
And the investors will cry "fraud" and "scam" not for the wrong reasons alone. Fraud and scam artists will actually infiltrate the hacker community once they find out about the exp…
-
comment
Comment #3341734
For a time I was embarrassed to even admit that I read it. I still am. The book is full of incredible people and events that don't and should not make any sense to a rational perso…
-
comment
Comment #3134913
You may be right - although I find myself inadequate to predict 6 months hence not to talk of 50 years. It just seemed the easiest 'odd man out' scenario so I commented.
-
comment
Comment #3134872
salman khan? along with those names?
-
comment
Comment #3111365
I won't judge siri, as I do not know the details of technology or the machine learning algorithms used by it, but I would say this much: your one line pitch might just impress some…
-
comment
Comment #3076884
I am using firefox 5.. they don't appear to move in my browser.
-
comment
Comment #3076735
looks great! only if you could make the gears move:)
-
comment
Comment #2832067
If you really want to be linguistically accurate, just replace "killing" with "taking market share away from". Other than that in my humble opinion, the central point is trivial.
-
comment
Comment #2581090
I totally agree. And I wish that this thing hurts them in some way. Having moved 3 times in last 3 years, I absolutely understand your situation of not being able to break up with …
-
comment
Comment #2581022
I am going slightly off topic here, but I wanna say I like the prospect of being able to save phone conversation for your record. But I was wondering about the legal implications o…
-
comment
Comment #2507948
I can't even imagine what combination of misconceptions about net neutrality and personal genomics led you to make such a comparison. Strong words - try just asking and I'll answer…
-
comment
Comment #2507705
sure - its the predicting thats causing the alarm, check this out.. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-847T
-
comment
Comment #2507686
By the way, it helps to atleast read what scientists found out about these reports before we build the whole discussion just on ideology http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-847T
-
comment
Comment #2507665
If they were just sequencing your genome, that wouldn't be a problem, but they are giving you medical advice, they are telling you about diseases that you might get (without solid …
-
comment
Comment #2507647
So I assume you are also against FDA regulation to force pharma companies to list adverse reactions alongside there drug commercials? If you are, then the discussion is mute, if yo…
-
comment
Comment #2507629
Does it matter? Maybe they will contribute something useful, maybe they won't. If we shut them down now, they definitely won't. Exactly - that's why I say don't shut them down, reg…
-
comment
Comment #2507528
Here is a nature paper (for those who can access) discussing the state of Direct-to-Consumer companies in personal genomics "An agenda for personalized medicine" http://www.nature.…