Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — posix_me_less

posix_me_less

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 15, 2018, 9:50 AM UTC
HN karma
417
Public activity
351 items

About posix_me_less

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30947358

    > must respect Mathematica. Respect a closed-source software which you can't easily check and improve, for academic work? No. It's a tool, not an academic achievement.

  2. comment
    Comment #30947236

    Feynman wrote something in the sense Wolfram did invent an interesting way to implement quantum chromodynamics on a computer, so he did something contributory to science.

  3. comment
    Comment #30946774

    It's an old reference, see e.g. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/sep/19/ideas.g2

  4. comment
    Comment #30946664

    > makes some predictions and is relativistically correct. Many of which are obviously wrong. We do not observe 11-dimensional world.

  5. comment
    Comment #30946646

    > is this any kind of science? It's the "new kind of science". /s

  6. comment
    Comment #30946491

    > computation systems seem to have hit a fevered pitch in the 2010s What do you mean?

  7. comment
    Comment #30946460

    You're describing generally positive traits, not specific to science. Science was pushed forward by many kinds of people, many of them obnoxious, arrogant, racists, etc. You can't …

  8. comment
    Comment #30626447

    From the article: > "users are more likely from a cost perspective to build a system with one of the more affordable B660, H670, and H610 chipsets and pair that with DDR4 memory"

  9. comment
    Comment #30554790

    Yes, that is the logical extension of this agenda. Let's make sure it won't be implemented.

  10. comment
    Comment #30554574

    What does resistance to liberalism manifest about being more communal or communist? Is resistance to privatisation a "resistance to liberalism" or "communist"? I don't think so. It…

  11. comment
    Comment #30500719

    In theory, https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Stand%20alon... In practice, it may be some controlled operation.

  12. comment
    Comment #30500559

    Putin's feelings maybe connected to russian nukes' status, so hold your horses and maybe let's not push democracy down his throat and be badly surprised later.

  13. comment
    Comment #30499761

    > rule of law based justice What other kinds of justice are there? In Russia they do not have law based justice?

  14. comment
    Comment #30498707

    Yeah. Russians aren't stupid to send most of their punch in the beginning. Russian actions are perhaps of lower success than expected, but strategically they are correct. First the…

  15. comment
    Comment #30498560

    It all depends on the situation. Why did they obliterate Katowice in the first place? Was is it an error, was is a retaliation, was it nonsensical move of a madman? Hopefully at so…

  16. comment
    Comment #30459166

    > Any nuclear attack by Russia on a NATO state guarantees the utter destruction of Russia. I hope this is not how nuclear strategy and tactics is prepared. If sane people are in ch…

  17. comment
    Comment #30459099

    This seemed far fetched to me, but I am starting to think this is the only rational strategy behind Western actions... poor Ukrainians, they did not deserve this.

  18. comment
    Comment #30459064

    Why would they get out and let Ukrainians to recover and then continue active military opposition? It takes so much effort and money to even get in. Invasion shows commitment, Russ…

  19. comment
    Comment #30458857

    True they have lots of nukes but simulations seem to favor US slightly in nuclear exchange. And definitely US by a large margin in a non-nuclear one.

  20. comment
    Comment #30458796

    Maybe there was a chance for a solution without invasion. But it seems West did not believe/want this. Either this was because West not wanting to look weak or they have a secret p…

  21. comment
    Comment #30458760

    Yeah but it's symbolic. It won't stop Russians, just prolong the suffering of people.

  22. comment
    Comment #30458600

    I have trouble understanding your point of view. What are you suggesting? I hope not that US starts nuclear war with Russia over disagreement about Ukraine?

  23. comment
    Comment #30458322

    > I don't understand the reasons for the invasion of Ukraine. I think I do. It seems to be the same as the reason for invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. Ukraine also started a tra…

  24. comment
    Comment #30457990

    Are you sure? Now Iran suddenly seems more likeable partner for oil trade than Russia. And Europe always wanted the JCPOA deal.

  25. comment
    Comment #30285869

    Since when people and governments are guaranteed to behave rationally? We should account for every possibility.