Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — positisop

positisop

HN member
Joined
Wed, May 14, 2025, 5:47 PM UTC
HN karma
39
Public activity
13 items

About positisop

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46139739

    github.com/NVIDIA/aistore At the 1 billion valuation from the previous round, achieving a successful exit requires a company with deep pockets. Right now, Nvidia is probably a suit…

  2. comment
    Comment #46137228

    Raising 100 mil at 1 B valuation and then trying for an exit is a bitch!

  3. comment
    Comment #46137210

    If it is not an Apache/CNCF/LinuxFoundation project, it can be a rug pull aimed at using open source for getting people in the door only. They were never open for commits, and now …

  4. comment
    Comment #46137152

    Raising 100 mil at 1 B valuation and then trying for an exit is a bitch!

  5. comment
    Comment #45205071

    Longhorn is a poorly implemented distributed storage layer. You are better off with Ceph.

  6. comment
    Comment #44893467

    NFS is its own spec, that is somewhat compliant with POSIX, and arguably FUSE is POSIX and can be used to implement a POSIX-compliant filesystem.

  7. comment
    Comment #44893241

    Please do not make decisions based on this article. It is a poorly written blog with typos and a lack of technical depth. The blog puts Goofys in the same bucket as JuiceFS and All…

  8. comment
    Comment #44868859

    Glad you wrote it, the title took me down the same path for a few seconds :-D

  9. comment
    Comment #44804649

    I think CS grads often skip the part of how something actually works and are happy with abstractions.

  10. comment
    Comment #44138279

    Google Cloud Storage had it for eons before S3. GCS comes across as a much better thought-out and built product.

  11. comment
    Comment #43988497

    They are not efficient; they have a one-time static hash to create a cluster. After that, it is all duct tape and glue. Want to expand? Add another cluster (pool) and then look for…

  12. comment
    Comment #43987596

    Look under the hood, the limitations are based on the core, sticking a UI on it does not hide what needs to happen at scale.

  13. comment
    Comment #43987329

    Try expanding a cluster, or changing erasure coding configuration, or using anything that needs random access within a file (parquet), or any day 2 operation.