Viewing profile — popmystack
popmystack
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Nov 13, 2015, 6:08 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -18
- Public activity
- 159 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About popmystack
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #12924242
>However they were pushed to that by accusations of bias in the right-wing media. As per my previous comments on this subject. The sources that got "censored" _happened_ to be cons…
-
comment
Comment #12920980
>Voters didn't vote for Trump because they read some fake news story on Facebook So all those posts I have on my Facebook feed about emails and Clinton corruption were just for not…
-
comment
Comment #12914903
> Hilary Clinton definitely couldn't provide any positive change Where is this coming from? There is absolutely no foundation for that statement.
-
comment
Comment #12912698
>with SJW culture This isn't actually a thing. It's an internet narrative that tends to be more projectionist than anything substantial.
-
comment
Comment #12911845
>Now let's move forward on the direction that's been chosen Which is what, exactly?
-
comment
Comment #12910617
> By talking about real issues that nobody else even dares to touch. Please enumerate them in a coherent fashion.
-
comment
Comment #12861430
>which is why most CDNs don't cache 404s in the first place. That definitely isn't technically true. There are other mechanisms usually involved in these cases, and should be for a…
-
comment
Comment #12784312
Yeah, the completely disingenuous rhetoric around these topics on HN is extremely grating for me, personally.
-
comment
Comment #12727335
>And before you say those scandals are a result of partisan witch-hunting, Obama never had these scandals that Hillary did. Um, are you just blanking 2004 out of your head? This is…
-
comment
Comment #12703517
This is what I agree with, and hence my original sentiment "this seems like a problem conservatives should address."
-
comment
Comment #12702866
I definitely didn't say anything remotely like that, so I'm really not sure how to respond to this. I'm really tired of the one-off pedantic and disingenuous posts people seem to b…
-
comment
Comment #12701322
There is nothing arbitrary about evidence based statements. Everything I stated is completely based on evidence from multiple sources, from the congressional investigations to repo…
-
comment
Comment #12701229
When you have multiple claims against you and you describe in detail taking actions that you've denied, it's no longer "joking" (Honestly, who jokes about stuff like that?) At that…
-
comment
Comment #12700151
>And Huff constantly publishes stories telling gender doesn't exist. They definitely don't do this. It seems like you have a significant misunderstanding of the literature being di…
-
comment
Comment #12700138
I'm sorry, what?
-
comment
Comment #12700110
>Huff is full of titles Trump is sexual predator without facts, just talks. We have, on record, him describing sexual assault. With his own words. On the other hand, some of the pe…
-
comment
Comment #12700094
That's a really cheap false equivalency. You've basically side nothing while ignorning the practical reality of what we're discussing. Take for example, the fact that Fox News will…
-
comment
Comment #12698417
I'm not sure what you want me to clarify? At no point did I indicate that it's okay to downvote people you disagree with. They should constructively contribute to the conversation,…
-
comment
Comment #12698388
You shouldn't downvote based on disagreement, on top of the fact that that seems like an incredibly disingenuous sentiment, what is your point?
-
comment
Comment #12698343
>primarily the low quality of Google's SDK for Android. This has always been my biggest frustration with Android. I've written a few applications for the platform, and while their …
-
comment
Comment #12698168
Yeah, all because people wanted to scream "bias." Sadly the community here seemed apt to agree with it, but I definitely have my opinions on that. Quoted from a previous thread: >D…
-
comment
Comment #12624511
>I'm surprised at how many people are responding negatively to software that improves user experience. At the cost of doing things technically correct.
-
comment
Comment #12624466
They are not doing the same thing. It's two completely different operations.
-
comment
Comment #12624139
>Consideration of these aspects may help you better convey your technical points. And yet despite him blatantly confronting me in an aggressive personal manner, you've ignored his …
-
comment
Comment #12623829
You consider his first post to be productive? You must be dreaming. > ajkjk strikes me as someone making reasonable points He is not making any point, so it's weird that you would …