Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ponco

ponco

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 05, 2016, 12:21 PM UTC
HN karma
194
Public activity
66 items

About ponco

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48856127

    I was being a bit cheeky, but I’m not really arguing that individual inventions can be determined as good or bad. My point is it comes from the same underlying mode of production. …

  2. comment
    Comment #48856029

    Darn, I tried this and the lithium battery kicked in.

  3. comment
    Comment #48855759

    The benefits of modernity (electricity, cars, iPhone, Claude) are good, but they come bundled with potentially terminal ecological costs which is bad.

  4. comment
    Comment #48622179

    Writing a custom solver seems kind of absurd to me. There are 10s(/100s?) of open source ones out there. HiGHS in particular seems to be challenging the paid solvers with its LP im…

  5. comment
    Comment #48289857

    I disagree with the analysis, although I liked the opening paragraph. Why separate the economics of interest rates from the economics of AI productivity?

  6. comment
    Comment #47737348

    Always good to challenge the narrative - but I don't pay for RDS Postgres because of the WAL, replication, all the beauty of pg etc. I pay RDS because it's largely set and forget. …

  7. comment
    Comment #47737294

    (disclosure: I wrote this)

  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #47647726

    more throughput WITHOUT huge tail latency is my understanding. A user above posted this link https://lwn.net/Articles/994322/ which goes into the background. My mental model is "gi…

  10. comment
    Comment #47055648

    I've speculated about this myself, but haven't heard anyone actually discuss it or reveal/leak this is the case. Do you have a source for this?

  11. comment
    Comment #46985943

    `peon --pack peasant` This was my first thought too, thankfully they thought of it!

  12. comment
    Comment #46985148

    This was a very bitter pill to swallow! It took me more than one mistake to learn this - "you are not the user".

  13. comment
    Comment #46523726

    Not OP, but I think that without some creative impetus like 'agency', how useful is an AGI going to be?

  14. comment
    Comment #46523709

    I agree. I'm imagining a large software team with hundreds of tickets "ready to be worked on" might support this workflow - but even then, surely you're going to start running into…

  15. comment
    Comment #45915441

    The privatisation of the commons will endure as our generations' greatest folly. I look at the Australian NBN as a great example of a project that is not economical for a private b…

  16. comment
    Comment #45692445

    Respectfully, I don't think that piece adds anything of material substance. It's a list of hollow platitudes (vapid writing listing inactionable truisms).

  17. comment
    Comment #45690596

    I reflect on university, and one of the most interesting projects I did was an 'essay on the history of ' as part of an OS course. I chose OS X (Snow Leopard) and digging into the …

  18. comment
    Comment #45487026

    A simple Google tells me (as I was curious) it's between 6 months to 20 years, with the average being 2 years. https://www.google.com/search?q=carbon+payback+time+solar+pa... Hard …

  19. comment
    Comment #44104745

    I had an old colleague who had a favourite lunch room trick - if challenged to Scissors, Paper, Rock then he would win every single time. I presumed it was some kind of behavioural…

  20. story
  21. comment
  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #42271305

    For a time, we did not have an “R” rating for video games and this sort of content called for this rating, which legislation said could not be given. Fortunately saner heads prevai…

  24. comment
    Comment #41289366

    Our family VCR had the "EZ Rewind" setting which would automatically rewind it to the beginning once the movie ended. Saved a lot of hassle.

  25. comment
    Comment #40583363

    Can anyone explain why this isn’t a discrete optimisation problem? I don’t understand what aspects of problem would require a non convex approach