Viewing profile — polkapolka
polkapolka
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 10, 2018, 12:35 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 42
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About polkapolka
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18710827
Did you run into latency problems doing arbitrage this way? Or do you rely on API's?
-
comment
Comment #18710227
You bypass the API completely and fill orders "manually".
-
comment
Comment #18696856
You are thinking too US-centric here. There are jurisdictions where this is allowed. Also don't stare yourself blind on the numbers. Do you unfairly deny 5 minorities or erroneousl…
-
comment
Comment #18696697
The identifying characteristics are signal for the minority, but noisy for genpop. Deployment/engineering constraints call for a single model. Realistic scenario.
-
comment
Comment #18693975
Eat your own dogfood. Let them douse their babies in asbestos, drink fracking water, or force them to watch Scientology advertisements.
-
comment
Comment #18691354
The ads are a red herring (and uncomfortably visible for both parties). The real activity was on Facebook groups, viralizing anti-immigration and far-left news, controling the narr…
-
comment
Comment #18650650
Statistical learning with connectionist architectures is driving current AI at scale. To me, this paradigm is also the most promising: learn from data bottom-up, not from experts t…
-
comment
Comment #18650481
Faster and more complex computers does not make you faster at manual programming. Computer vision had this before the DL boom: engineers painfully crafting feature extractors. It w…
-
comment
Comment #18648212
Symbolic AI is machine programming. Connectionist AI is machine learning. Machine programming simply does not scale. It is also not biologically plausible: it is not as if God put …
-
comment
Comment #18340260
Agreed. Logistic regression with poly kernel or good engineering interactions can equal or beat more complex models for a fraction of the budget. All the more power to you if a sol…
-
comment
Comment #18340192
Text data traditionally seen as unstructured. Try a simple MLP.
-
comment
Comment #18340173
For an accessible recent overview see: https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/
-
comment
Comment #18339398
Yeah, it is a good first benchmark. But view interpretability as separate from accuracy. You can explain black box algorithms just fine these days. Logistic regression is high bias…
-
comment
Comment #18339146
Sure there are constraint and pros and cons, but still: pick a neural network for unstructured data. Can always unsupervised pretrain and fine tune on a tiny dataset.
-
comment
Comment #18337934
The image for logistic regression is hilariously wrong. It shows the sigmoid as a decision boundary. Also dont get hung up about no free lunch theorem. That is a great result in co…
-
comment
Comment #18017291
I give Musk a little bit more credit than brutely calling someone a pedo without any proof. If you are as rich as Musk, there must be someone you can pay to dig up dirt on your opp…
-
comment
Comment #17920936
Csv and a permitive license like CC0. Provide good meta data to make provenance easier. Mark up your dataset with schema.org.
-
comment
Comment #17900267
Gone to sleep for the final time. Ash to ... And dust to dust.
-
comment
Comment #17367957
Dennett aims to solve this using heterophenemenology: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterophenomenology In this framework, utterances can be studied without taking their truth va…
-
comment
Comment #16112657
If you spend one year on applying deep learning, you can train a net on a 100 different data sets. That's where the intuition comes from. You'll debug a lot. People with zero exper…
-
comment
Comment #16111579
Articles like these should come with a disclosure: "the authors own bitcoin and augur" or something to that effect.