Viewing profile — polarized
polarized
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 26, 2011, 7:46 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 15
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About polarized
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18712927
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_v._Ohio_Elections_Com...
-
comment
Comment #16050402
> fast random access memory That term is misleading and implies actual RAM-type memory is needed, which is untrue. Monero scales quite well using a database on SSD up to transactio…
-
comment
Comment #15433002
80% for the first 4 years. 90% "eventually"
-
comment
Comment #14162180
The comment to which I replied (not by you) claimed that the anonymity set is all shielded transactions. It is, in the same sense that the first order anonymity set of Monero trans…
-
comment
Comment #14143715
Yes you are likely correct that "most recent" being the "most likely" is not accurate. However, there is a distribution and it has a peak. It is certainly not flat, so it is incorr…
-
comment
Comment #14138051
Sorry my mistake. My comment was about Section 4, not Section 3. RingCT is immune to the methods in Section 3 as stated in the last paragraph of Section 3. Section 4 does not trace…
-
comment
Comment #14137445
> the first to unveil real problems with Monero It is not. The problems were previously identified and documented by Monero developers, and the paper acknowledges this. The paper a…
-
comment
Comment #14137395
> The point they are trying to make is that the anonymity set between shielded addresses is that of all transactions in the anonymous set. This way of stating is somewhat questiona…
-
comment
Comment #14137383
The technique in the second half of the paper is not able to trace any transactions at all, as I explained in more detail in another reply. It identifies a partial weakness in the …
-
comment
Comment #14137374
It was a deliberate design decision as the issue was mitigated in a different manner starting in early 2016 (and introducing that check wouldn't be very effective anyway for other …
-
comment
Comment #14137348
The section 3 vulnerability traces (aka "de-anonymizes") precisely no transactions at all. It indicates that the probabilities across potential outputs sources are biased, but does…
-
comment
Comment #2586996
Maybe but things like domain squatting and the inability to shut down domains pointing to illegal or controversial sites is likely to be quite controversial.
-
comment
Comment #2586991
Running the service does not use very much CPU time. Mining is separate, and you don't even need to do that just to keep the domain up.