Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — polarized

polarized

HN member
Joined
Thu, May 26, 2011, 7:46 AM UTC
HN karma
15
Public activity
13 items

About polarized

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #18712927

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_v._Ohio_Elections_Com...

  2. comment
    Comment #16050402

    > fast random access memory That term is misleading and implies actual RAM-type memory is needed, which is untrue. Monero scales quite well using a database on SSD up to transactio…

  3. comment
    Comment #15433002

    80% for the first 4 years. 90% "eventually"

  4. comment
    Comment #14162180

    The comment to which I replied (not by you) claimed that the anonymity set is all shielded transactions. It is, in the same sense that the first order anonymity set of Monero trans…

  5. comment
    Comment #14143715

    Yes you are likely correct that "most recent" being the "most likely" is not accurate. However, there is a distribution and it has a peak. It is certainly not flat, so it is incorr…

  6. comment
    Comment #14138051

    Sorry my mistake. My comment was about Section 4, not Section 3. RingCT is immune to the methods in Section 3 as stated in the last paragraph of Section 3. Section 4 does not trace…

  7. comment
    Comment #14137445

    > the first to unveil real problems with Monero It is not. The problems were previously identified and documented by Monero developers, and the paper acknowledges this. The paper a…

  8. comment
    Comment #14137395

    > The point they are trying to make is that the anonymity set between shielded addresses is that of all transactions in the anonymous set. This way of stating is somewhat questiona…

  9. comment
    Comment #14137383

    The technique in the second half of the paper is not able to trace any transactions at all, as I explained in more detail in another reply. It identifies a partial weakness in the …

  10. comment
    Comment #14137374

    It was a deliberate design decision as the issue was mitigated in a different manner starting in early 2016 (and introducing that check wouldn't be very effective anyway for other …

  11. comment
    Comment #14137348

    The section 3 vulnerability traces (aka "de-anonymizes") precisely no transactions at all. It indicates that the probabilities across potential outputs sources are biased, but does…

  12. comment
    Comment #2586996

    Maybe but things like domain squatting and the inability to shut down domains pointing to illegal or controversial sites is likely to be quite controversial.

  13. comment
    Comment #2586991

    Running the service does not use very much CPU time. Mining is separate, and you don't even need to do that just to keep the domain up.