Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — plasticmachine

plasticmachine

HN member
Joined
Fri, Nov 06, 2015, 8:45 PM UTC
HN karma
74
Public activity
73 items

About plasticmachine

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #16688065

    Same goes for TLS - there's ample evidence that TLS data is being suctioned up at scale and stored for eventual decryption.

  2. comment
    Comment #16382677

    Anyone can be a Monero contributor and can work on the hard fork.

  3. comment
    Comment #16382671

    Why would you assume all miners accept the hard fork? They don't have to.

  4. comment
    Comment #16382660

    Everything is open and transparent, so a "leak" is absolutely guaranteed. It appears the plan is to merely make some sort of change every 6 months such that an ASIC manufacturer ha…

  5. comment
    Comment #16382643

    There are no "insiders" with Monero. Just like many FOSS projects, everything is developed in the open and entirely transparently. The first time anyone has visibility on PoW chang…

  6. comment
    Comment #16382611

    That's an unfair statement. The Monero Research Lab has several full-time PhD'd cryptographers who are paid for by crowdfunding from the community, just none who are specialised en…

  7. comment
    Comment #16062585

    But they DO need privacy, they're more at risk of targeted theft than regular users. ZCash fails at this by making it impossibly hard for an exchange to allow z-address withdrawals…

  8. comment
    Comment #15376847

    I’m a massive MW proponent but the privacy claims are very weak compared to ZCash and Monero. What MW does well is scalability.

  9. comment
    Comment #14142555

    No it isn't, the paper is a re-hash of the work that the Monero team themselves put out in September 2014 and in January 2015. https://lab.getmonero.org/pubs/MRL-0001.pdf https://l…

  10. comment
    Comment #14142503

    You couldn't buy drugs with Monero until the end of 2016 when, coincidentally, RingCT was hard-forked in and this paper's entire basis for existence disappeared. Also two of the Mo…

  11. comment
    Comment #14142396

    I doubt it; they stop serving data after the beginning of 2017 precisely because RingCT breaks their algorithms.

  12. comment
    Comment #14142390

    > The sloppiness of this code is really shocking, "when the Monero client chooses mixins, it does not take into account whether the potential mixins have already been spent." That'…

  13. comment
    Comment #14142318

    > I haven't seen any evidence of 'academic dishonesty'. How about one of the authors Tweeting out that 80% of the Monero transactions have been deanonymized ( https://twitter.com/r…

  14. comment
    Comment #14142221

    What do you mean "if Monero fixes everything"? They already fixed everything, which is why the paper shows the decline in their ability to deduce things, and the paper COMPLETELY S…

  15. comment
    Comment #13681712

    As does Monero's RingCT, which is based on Blockstream's Confidential Transactions. Obviously there are implementation risks, but in terms of cryptographic risk you are correct.

  16. comment
    Comment #13361180

    You specifically said Bitcoin would get everything Monero has, so https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading

  17. comment
    Comment #13359920

    https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem Name the lies I've told, please, and be specific.

  18. comment
    Comment #13359701

    1. You're right, I would be surprised, because so many people have spoken out against ZCash - the compromises it makes are simply too great compared to the limited benefit over oth…

  19. comment
    Comment #13359649

    By "the Monero guys" you mean the broader technical community that understand security software design? Also, obscure origins are irrelevant when the technology is solid. Take the …

  20. comment
    Comment #13358744

    1. Given that not even Zooko understands zk-SNARKs, the ZCash name is trademarked, and they've shut down their Reddit and IRC channels, there is no chance of a community of compete…

  21. comment
    Comment #13358664

    Or maybe we're just not buying into cryptography being pushed by a company that has a marketing department.

  22. comment
    Comment #13357888

    Ummmm no. 1. It's controlled by a corporation with VC backing. This leads to a single point of failure, a ton of disincentives, and makes it easier for an attacker. 2. The cryptogr…

  23. comment
    Comment #13357340

    No he doesn't. Go read what he wrote again. Private transactions (one z-addr sends to another z-addr) were not being mined.

  24. comment
    Comment #13357323

    He's 100% correct, as is the GitHub issue. Transactions that were z-addr -> t-addr, or vice versa, were being mined, but private transactions (my z-addr pays your z-addr) were not.…

  25. comment
    Comment #13355525

    You know that it's forked from Bitcoin right? What portion of the tax is being given to the Bitcoin developers?