Viewing profile — plagiat0r
plagiat0r
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 30, 2023, 4:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 47
- Public activity
- 93 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About plagiat0r
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48032292
Unfortunately bind is as buggy as it always been. I've tried to black hole entire ::/0 but it still eat its query counter without even sending out a single packet. You need dual st…
-
comment
Comment #47939124
Your should rather say - it's always bind (bugs). I wrote about bind eating their query counter on IPv6 even if you don't have IPv6 routing: https://szafka.net/blog/bind9-as-resolv…
-
comment
Comment #47359985
Unpopular opinion: Maybe the way to go is to create a separate Show HNs only for bots and put some instructions for the bots to follow, identify themselves and give them separate c…
-
comment
Comment #47290908
Back in the 90/2000 the was a very popular tool named rrdtool to store metrics in a round robin structure on disk, especially suited for network metrics. The goal of the storage wa…
-
comment
Comment #47097884
And the link to vscode is now 404. It's gone.
-
comment
Comment #47081173
All I'm saying is that publishing final certificate is not required for the process, so just assuming it will be there is premature. User may end up putting precert on his https se…
-
comment
Comment #47075935
Most acmev2 clients create account on certificate request. That is precisely why I wrote this: https://github.com/pawlakus/acmecli This small tool will allow you to just create, re…
-
comment
Comment #47075786
Thank you, this draft is literally perfect and I wish we had this years ago. Most people don't know about acmev2 account rekeying either. It is great you decided to use account uri…
-
comment
Comment #47075477
X509 certificates published in CT logs are "pre-certificates". They contains a poison extension so you don't be able to use them with your private key. The final certificate (witho…
-
comment
Comment #47075469
X509 certificates published in CT logs are "pre-certificates". They contains a poison extension so you don't be able to use them with your private key. The final certificate (witho…
-
comment
Comment #46506425
Thanks for the service. Personally I would lower the TTL to 120 or less. Dyndns is used for personal stuff. There is no point caching a FQDN almost nobody use. If anything, low TTL…
-
story
Show HN: Tiny acmecli for ACMEv2 account mgmt and for DNS-persist-01
Over the years I've used many acme clients, and noticed that a lot of them often lack acmev2 account management functions. It is also non-trivial to migrate between them with keepi…
-
comment
Comment #45995817
Duplicate, it is submitted third time.
-
comment
Comment #45984192
Duplicate of: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45973177
-
comment
Comment #45983909
Given the bind security and functional track record over the last 30 years, I would pick knot/nsd/yadifa/powerDNS/coredns/tinydns in a heartbeat for authoritative dns server.
-
comment
Comment #45973055
Windows 10, 11 and most major OSes have ipv6 enabled and it is preferred. There is also a Happy eyeball algorithm browsers use to connect - RFC 8305. However, the most important th…
-
comment
Comment #45872258
The thing is, they do not support wildcard TLS, no way to pass acme dns-01 challenge.
-
comment
Comment #45048562
Sounds like divorce, you need a lawyer.
-
comment
Comment #45006768
Spin up a vps in a different country, and VPN your entire traffic over this vps. Wireguard or OpenVPN.
-
comment
Comment #44398544
Authoritative or resolver?
-
comment
Comment #43933767
But when setting up a full recursive resolver, you should avoid using root servers directly for queries, but rather mirror the root zone locally: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/h…
-
comment
Comment #43759148
I've checked the site, it looks very nice on mobile. However, some checks have bugs or they makes no sense: 1. SPF missing ?all is broken, it report missing when it is there 2. Che…
-
comment
Comment #43543394
> But up to this point, that's what the author has been doing. They've setup bind to run on IPv4 and IPv6 but not really the latter, instead blackholing all such requests. Well, Li…
-
comment
Comment #43537686
This article summarize my findings on what I believe to be a buggy recursive algorithm. Main actors: BIND-9.18, BIND-9.20 and wireshark.
- story