Viewing profile — pkmays
pkmays
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 1:57 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 288
- Public activity
- 36 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pkmays
Texas, United States
http://www.pkmays.com/
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8477645
http://domenic.me Editor Domenic Denicola's website
- story
-
comment
Comment #5212170
Developing for the console seems really harsh. Somewhat related, an indie company managed to get a fighting game out on PSN and XBLA. It just got an update on PS3, but it can't get…
-
comment
Comment #4699683
Oddly, Windows 7 Pro does have DVD support out of the box.
-
comment
Comment #4687115
Wayland can eventually fill the role on Linux perhaps. X11 is built to run on many more operating systems. This is my main issue with Wayland. Whence portability?
-
comment
Comment #4686624
Wayland isn't going to replace X11, it's going to be an alternative to X11.
-
comment
Comment #4589582
Not mentioned among the major features: Windows builds have finally moved to Visual Studio 2010.
-
comment
Comment #4367902
Glad to hear this. Digia has treated Qt very good.
-
comment
Comment #4300816
I'm not a fan of KDE, but I do like Qt. Qt seems to suffer from kitchen sink syndrome, but the core GUI API is well designed. If someone did for Qt what XFCE/LXDE did for GTK+, I t…
-
comment
Comment #4300799
Sounds about right. I think a lot of developers buy a MacBook with the intention of dual booting to Linux, but end up just sticking with OSX.
-
comment
Comment #4096468
Yes, Qt still uses moc. I leave it up to you to decide if that's a good thing or a bad thing.
-
comment
Comment #4024437
I found it very hard to read this. The whole time my brain kept getting distracted by how bad the fonts look.
-
comment
Comment #3968560
He did. From http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html : > ...I consider it a pretty good set of rules for safety critical and performance critical code. If you do embedded sys…
-
comment
Comment #3960952
Whoa wait, we are really supposed to replace X with something that only works on Linux? Way to give BSD guys the middle finger.
-
comment
Comment #3953723
I'm not C++ savvy, but I know from reading Google's C++ style guide that they also disable exceptions. The guide leaves it at that and doesn't say anything more about how to deal w…
-
comment
Comment #3940673
I'm surprised they think developers would be interested in this. Having worked with Dell in IT, you couldn't pay me to use anything they put their name on. Dell have a bad reputati…
-
comment
Comment #3940627
There are some Good Parts to C99/C11, most of them adopted from Unix and Plan 9. Not surprisingly, most of the bad parts are all inventions. Read the link to dmr's comment again. H…
-
comment
Comment #3940185
Unlike ICC, MinGW's gcc.exe is not a drop in replacement for cl.exe. It's a separate compilation environment. The headers are different and often out of date compared to the Window…
-
comment
Comment #3940075
Good for Microsoft. If they think something is standardized garbage then they shouldn't have to use it. C99 and C11 look like mutants compared to C89. Too many bad design decisions…
-
comment
Comment #3926297
From the Dr Dobb's link: > The C99 standard is interesting because it was created at a time when a lot of people on the previous committee went away and did other things. And it wa…
-
comment
Comment #3907011
> What part of that process requires UTF-16? JavaScript doesn't require UTF-16; it just requires Unicode. You could use UTF-8 in your JavaScript implementation as well. Actually, J…
-
comment
Comment #3900829
Thanks. Those specific complaints from the link seemed more like quality of implementation issues of typical ECMAScript editors vs Adobe's ActionScript IDE. I can live without type…
-
comment
Comment #3900100
Are there really no JavaScript-capable IDEs out there that support code completion, jump to definition, re-factoring, etc? I don't see anything in the language that would preclude …
-
comment
Comment #3893172
Speak of the devil. http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2012/n334...
-
comment
Comment #3889099
I bet a lot of folks under the Iron Curtain would have loved to have had access to these documents back in the day.