Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pkmays

pkmays

HN member
Joined
Fri, Feb 12, 2010, 1:57 AM UTC
HN karma
288
Public activity
36 items

About pkmays

PK Mays

Texas, United States

http://www.pkmays.com/

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #8477645

    http://domenic.me Editor Domenic Denicola's website

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #5212170

    Developing for the console seems really harsh. Somewhat related, an indie company managed to get a fighting game out on PSN and XBLA. It just got an update on PS3, but it can't get…

  4. comment
    Comment #4699683

    Oddly, Windows 7 Pro does have DVD support out of the box.

  5. comment
    Comment #4687115

    Wayland can eventually fill the role on Linux perhaps. X11 is built to run on many more operating systems. This is my main issue with Wayland. Whence portability?

  6. comment
    Comment #4686624

    Wayland isn't going to replace X11, it's going to be an alternative to X11.

  7. comment
    Comment #4589582

    Not mentioned among the major features: Windows builds have finally moved to Visual Studio 2010.

  8. comment
    Comment #4367902

    Glad to hear this. Digia has treated Qt very good.

  9. comment
    Comment #4300816

    I'm not a fan of KDE, but I do like Qt. Qt seems to suffer from kitchen sink syndrome, but the core GUI API is well designed. If someone did for Qt what XFCE/LXDE did for GTK+, I t…

  10. comment
    Comment #4300799

    Sounds about right. I think a lot of developers buy a MacBook with the intention of dual booting to Linux, but end up just sticking with OSX.

  11. comment
    Comment #4096468

    Yes, Qt still uses moc. I leave it up to you to decide if that's a good thing or a bad thing.

  12. comment
    Comment #4024437

    I found it very hard to read this. The whole time my brain kept getting distracted by how bad the fonts look.

  13. comment
    Comment #3968560

    He did. From http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html : > ...I consider it a pretty good set of rules for safety critical and performance critical code. If you do embedded sys…

  14. comment
    Comment #3960952

    Whoa wait, we are really supposed to replace X with something that only works on Linux? Way to give BSD guys the middle finger.

  15. comment
    Comment #3953723

    I'm not C++ savvy, but I know from reading Google's C++ style guide that they also disable exceptions. The guide leaves it at that and doesn't say anything more about how to deal w…

  16. comment
    Comment #3940673

    I'm surprised they think developers would be interested in this. Having worked with Dell in IT, you couldn't pay me to use anything they put their name on. Dell have a bad reputati…

  17. comment
    Comment #3940627

    There are some Good Parts to C99/C11, most of them adopted from Unix and Plan 9. Not surprisingly, most of the bad parts are all inventions. Read the link to dmr's comment again. H…

  18. comment
    Comment #3940185

    Unlike ICC, MinGW's gcc.exe is not a drop in replacement for cl.exe. It's a separate compilation environment. The headers are different and often out of date compared to the Window…

  19. comment
    Comment #3940075

    Good for Microsoft. If they think something is standardized garbage then they shouldn't have to use it. C99 and C11 look like mutants compared to C89. Too many bad design decisions…

  20. comment
    Comment #3926297

    From the Dr Dobb's link: > The C99 standard is interesting because it was created at a time when a lot of people on the previous committee went away and did other things. And it wa…

  21. comment
    Comment #3907011

    > What part of that process requires UTF-16? JavaScript doesn't require UTF-16; it just requires Unicode. You could use UTF-8 in your JavaScript implementation as well. Actually, J…

  22. comment
    Comment #3900829

    Thanks. Those specific complaints from the link seemed more like quality of implementation issues of typical ECMAScript editors vs Adobe's ActionScript IDE. I can live without type…

  23. comment
    Comment #3900100

    Are there really no JavaScript-capable IDEs out there that support code completion, jump to definition, re-factoring, etc? I don't see anything in the language that would preclude …

  24. comment
    Comment #3893172

    Speak of the devil. http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2012/n334...

  25. comment
    Comment #3889099

    I bet a lot of folks under the Iron Curtain would have loved to have had access to these documents back in the day.