Viewing profile — pitkali
pitkali
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Sep 11, 2012, 12:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 91
- Public activity
- 73 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pitkali
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49207103
When I lived in Sweden I had an 8-digit pin and biometrics enabled, indeed.
-
comment
Comment #49194537
> I think the real problem is Google Play Services. It's far, far too tightly integrated in a way that it just seems like Android was designed to be unusable without. Wasn't the po…
-
comment
Comment #48657800
Oh, yeah, the Snowfield itself is secret enough, but getting to the palace afterwards is just a matter of exploration. The teleport is not that hidden. FWIW, after you get one half…
-
comment
Comment #48656191
All the speedrunners just kill the guy in the jar to get the medallion: you don't have to talk to him. Also, all you have to do in the Snowfield is to take a teleporter: that's not…
-
comment
Comment #48459133
The peasants did not live for long, though, did they? Hard to say if and how the diet contributed, but just because people rarely ate meat then, for example, doesn't necessarily me…
-
comment
Comment #48277825
Code review just means you need an accomplice. It makes it harder, not impossible.
-
comment
Comment #48205293
Its mere availability is not "encouragement."
-
comment
Comment #48177439
I never got the idea from git itself that changing history is encouraged. What makes you say otherwise?
-
comment
Comment #48177392
I don't think the internal design is/was that similar. We switched from CVS to git, and were evaluating multiple choices. What tipped the scale in the end was our trust in the inte…
-
comment
Comment #48177338
Meh. While I agree that Mercurial had easier to use CLI, there was maybe 1 time over the last 15 years or whatever when I needed anything other than git reset --hard. Although, I s…
-
comment
Comment #48177288
The way I remember it was that bookmarks were added because the git branching model became so popular. The "branches" in Mercurial were allegedly not designed with short-lived feat…
-
comment
Comment #48177270
Mercurial had an easier to use command line interface. If that's what makes it far better technology, we have a very different idea what makes the "technology" better.
-
comment
Comment #48177234
The non-professional flow you described does not require merging in git either. I suppose most teaching resources about git go deep into merging because it was created for distribu…
-
comment
Comment #46703870
I got my first MacBook around 2010 because I was tired of fixing suspend to RAM every few Nvidia driver updates on my ThinkPad. Then I paid for a commercial VM to seamlessly run so…
-
comment
Comment #46510718
Removing all manifest v2 support is also a code change that can be reverted. Of course, the larger the change, the more work it's likely to require to maintain it in the future.
-
comment
Comment #46300086
A typical example for English is the adjective order.
-
comment
Comment #44579721
I have to wonder to what extent the strangeness is just unfamiliarity.
-
comment
Comment #44432327
Google is not the only provider of Chrome extensions (yet?).
-
comment
Comment #43532693
> But because it hasn't become cannon in any group or culture, it's a bad idea in that it doesn't produce human flourishing. I am not convinced that's certain. At best, we can tell…
-
comment
Comment #43318989
Rampant misinformation certainly makes it harder to figure things out, but I disagree that it somehow removes people's right to vote for what's best for them or making an educated …
-
comment
Comment #43278541
For me, the crisp text was the reason retina became a must.
-
comment
Comment #42998600
Sure, but a screen, even a touchscreen, is not mutually exclusive with buttons. My Toyota has both, and after setting up the navigation, I can go the whole way and do everything wi…
-
comment
Comment #42850617
It's not separate, but they don't necessarily have to use them like that. They merely can.
-
comment
Comment #42188815
I don't think you appreciate how easy it is for the chromium forks to add their own ad blocking. This is simply not a good example of monopoly abuse on Google's part.
-
comment
Comment #42181730
Because development costs money. Your "impossible to keep up" here is easily explained by Google simply investing more money in development and thus being able to "innovate" faster…