Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pipe_connector

pipe_connector

HN member
Joined
Fri, Mar 04, 2022, 9:29 PM UTC
HN karma
71
Public activity
37 items

About pipe_connector

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40902127

    It's fair to distrust something because you were burned by using it in the past. However, both the examples you named -- Postgres and FoundationDB -- have had similar concurrency a…

  2. comment
    Comment #40901255

    MongoDB (via WiredTiger) has used MVCC to solve this problem since transactions were introduced.

  3. comment
    Comment #40900463

    Yes, I have worked on an application that pushed enormous volumes of data through MongoDB's transactions. Deadlocks are an application issue. If you built your application the same…

  4. comment
    Comment #40900004

    Jepsen found a more concerning consistency bug than the above results when Postgres 12 was evaluated [1]. Relevant text: We [...] found that transactions executed with serializable…

  5. comment
    Comment #40898447

    MongoDB has supported the equivalent of Postgres' serializable isolation for many years now. I'm not sure what "with strong consistency benefits" means.

  6. comment
    Comment #40313839

    Agreed that this property is useful for efficiency. The danger comes from users believing this property is a guarantee and making correctness decisions based on it. There is no suc…

  7. comment
    Comment #37094895

    I agree with the characterization of applications you've laid out and think everyone should consider whether they're working on a "tall" (most users use a narrow band of functional…

  8. comment
    Comment #37057455

    https://packaging-con.org/about Lorem ipseum -- whoops!

  9. comment
    Comment #37023584

    Sure, I understand how to authenticate to my remote machine with a smartcard (and already do use this setup). I'm wondering how to authenticate to resources (over HTTP) from my rem…

  10. comment
    Comment #37023417

    Doesn't this only solve the problem for resources I am accessing over SSH? What about if I wanted to access something over HTTP like my web browser does?

  11. comment
    Comment #37023392

    Maybe I'm just missing something, let me explain: I've already ssh'd to my work machine. I want to send an HTTP request to my company's internal web API from that machine, but we o…

  12. comment
    Comment #37022984

    Sorry, I think I missed something because the article doesn't mention GPG at all. How can you make a webauthn client defer to gpg-agent?

  13. comment
    Comment #37022803

    How do you authenticate from a machine that isn't local to you? I don't do any work on my work-issued laptop, I use a powerful remote machine instead.

  14. comment
    Comment #36924749

    While this might make this situation more likely to occur, you can never prevent concurrent accesses from happening in a distributed system.

  15. comment
    Comment #36689701

    This Bubblewrap is much older than the one you've linked.

  16. comment
    Comment #36453273

    Lots of people being negative about this, but if you've ever implemented anything that works in near-real-time at wide scale, most of this design makes sense and it works great. On…

  17. comment
    Comment #36428173

    You can still use a dedicated diff tool for these situations if they come up regularly. In my experience they are better than vim anyhow.

  18. comment
    Comment #36190355

    kubernetes can use anything that conforms to the CRI interface, which in practice is either CRI-O (RedHat) or Containerd (Docker, Inc.). Podman and Docker are also consumers of bot…

  19. comment
    Comment #35108599

    Not everyone agrees that TCP support is required for DNS: https://twitter.com/RichFelker/status/994667677112156161 Though I don't personally agree with that reading of the RFC.

  20. comment
    Comment #34696829

    500,000 requests/day is ~6 requests per second.

  21. comment
    Comment #33714463

    In general I agree with you, but Go's simple syntax means that there are extremely few (if any? I've never run into one) edge cases with checking that an error was at least conside…

  22. comment
    Comment #33714430

    https://github.com/kisielk/errcheck Every Go project I've worked on has used this linter. I think it should be builtin, but it's very easy to incorporate.

  23. comment
    Comment #33439870

    It would appear that the changeset the OP was having trouble getting through review is here: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/text/+/421914

  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #32768114

    If I'm reading your feedback correctly it sounds like you want: 1) Syntactic sugar for if err != nil { return err }; similar to ? in Rust 2) The errcheck linter to be enforced (par…