Viewing profile — phyllotaxis
phyllotaxis
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 20, 2011, 1:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 16
- Public activity
- 63 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About phyllotaxis
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #2861259
In my view, a focus on the results of scientists is becoming more important than the individual scientists doing the work. With instant fact-checking and world-wide collaboration, …
-
comment
Comment #2854257
Lewrockwell.com is a correlary to Mises.org. The focus there is on non-technical commentary, where LvMI is more scholarly. There are thousands of media files, audio, video, and e-b…
-
story
Ask HN: When do you "make it official" and form an LLC/corp?
I am of two minds on this. Do more people 1) create the business entity side early, to operate under, or 2) keep arrangements informal until your project is matured?
-
comment
Comment #2843905
I wonder how the "multiple bubble universes" hypotheses deal with a few of the problems regarding relativity theory: It's explained here- http://knol.google.com/k/einstein-was-wron…
-
comment
Comment #2839301
Too bad I've been forced to pay a $10/mo fee for the past year for 4G 'access' when the closest place to 'access' Sprint's nearest 4G is hours down the highway. Ya' pissed me off o…
-
comment
Comment #2833213
I have been here posting actively for a bit over a month, and had accrued 56 karma through that time. In a single comment regarding something related to physics, I posted a link to…
-
comment
Comment #2828614
Excellent piece. I embrace any message that points out the direct action by the artist to make themselves known, and find their listeners. Hail NIN and Radiohead! I paid cash to th…
-
comment
Comment #2828574
This is a great list of good reads. I wonder, what would the author think of this essay, relating to some potential faults on the Quant approach as it is currently practiced: http:…
-
comment
Comment #2823373
Perhaps this is just a a smug, vindictive thing to do.
-
comment
Comment #2819413
Here. http://knol.google.com/k/einstein-was-wrong-falsifying-obser... You ask for details, I hand them to thee.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #2804760
I'm writing from a phone, unable to write with any depth. See this list of papers written on the topic http://public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/papers.html
-
comment
Comment #2803901
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/Bayes.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/AppendixB.pdf http://members.cox.net/dascott3/IEEE-TransPlasmaSci-Scott-Au... http://www.haltonarp.com/arti…
-
comment
Comment #2803756
Look, I've been reading the same science you have been for 25 years. I have excitedly followed every development from Hawkings discovery of black holes to Feynmans physics work to …
-
comment
Comment #2803662
People like Galileo? Einstein? Maxwell? Crick? Pasteur? I apologize for offending sensibilies here. For those that are actually intellectually curious, I ask you to read the data. …
-
comment
Comment #2803497
Flatline, read the site. Read the links. I would never spam this site with wacked out bullshit. Look past personality here and read the science of plasma and electricity explaining…
-
comment
Comment #2803458
Read the site . Why cherry-pick and post something to make the entire premises look foolish? This is not what I expected in this place. I would not post this here if there were not…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #2803227
EDIT - WHY IS THIS STATEMENT DOWNVOTED? REALLY? There are huge flaws in the art as it is practiced today. They aren't finding what they're looking for because it IS NOT THERE. Go t…
-
comment
Comment #2800574
How would you distinguish your approach from, say, StumbleUpon?
-
comment
Comment #2800438
This 2 minute chat just rocked my world :)
-
comment
Comment #2800218
This is my favorite read all week. Thank you! As an "idea writer" with plenty of notebooks around at all times to capture thought fairies, this is a freakin beautiful way to extend…
-
comment
Comment #2799816
Related: http://mobile.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/07...
-
comment
Comment #2799496
I like what he says very much. Perhaps his title is a bit incendiary, but the principles he writes on are very lucid, and I found myself thinking hard about them. Excellent read.