Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — photonerd

photonerd

HN member
Joined
Sun, May 28, 2023, 11:01 PM UTC
HN karma
764
Public activity
328 items

About photonerd

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43524864

    > Recently I tried helping someone to get a file from a PC to their iPhone. The best options were either weird file sharing services or an USB stick like a barbarian. Those… aren’t…

  2. comment
    Comment #39408956

    Scrum is supposed to be training wheels for agile, not the end point. I think a lot of ppl forget that.

  3. comment
    Comment #38581329

    Plenty of people clutched pearls (rightly) about IE tho. And https by default. And much more. That it’s not currently a problem is due to 25 years of strongly pushing for privacy &…

  4. comment
    Comment #38581292

    Given Android users don’t have iMessage that’s kind of not an issue then.

  5. comment
    Comment #38581019

    Charlie certainly was (he took a copy from Bob). Bob is the distributor in this context however. In most Berne convention states he broke copyright law (technically, but nothing wo…

  6. comment
    Comment #38580980

    Taking just means, broadly, “to gain or acquire”. Repetition of an incorrect point doesn’t make it any more valid I’m afraid. Copying is often called taking a copy. Even basic usag…

  7. comment
    Comment #38580952

    Taking can simply mean “to gain or acquire”. So, once again, incorrect. Sorry. I’m sympathetic to the moral argument you’re making—though when the raw goods are digital too I think…

  8. comment
    Comment #38580937

    Copying is “gaining or acquiring” so would come under “taking”, sorry.

  9. comment
    Comment #38580933

    Taking can simply mean “to gain or acquire”. If that’s your argument… it’s unsound linguistics and legally.

  10. comment
    Comment #38580909

    > The key part is depriving the original owner of the use of the item. I know that’s been a tribal shibboleth of piracy since the 2000s, and I’m sympathetic to the moral argument t…

  11. comment
    Comment #38580852

    Doesn’t need to have a transaction to be stealing. You just need to take (or appropriate) something that you’re not allowed to.

  12. comment
    Comment #38580836

    Incorrect. You’re using one of the intransitive definitions but general speaking it’s the transitive forms that apply to digital content, ideas, information, etc. 1. to take or app…

  13. comment
    Comment #38220984

    The last solar install I saw retrofitted to a (reasonably large) parking lot took about 3 days & the lot was only partially reduced in capacity for that time. There’s really very l…

  14. comment
    Comment #38220852

    Yeah, it’s completely meaningless to compare but HN loves specs & seemingly hasn’t learned—after about 15 years of it being true—that direct spec comparisons are meaningless. I see…

  15. comment
    Comment #38148288

    Wait until you learn about the oil industry…

  16. comment
    Comment #38129005

    That’s… almost literally the worst tape product you could use (outside of obviously awful ideas like Duct Tape). In fact repairing use of scotch tape has its own whole section in m…

  17. comment
    Comment #38119826

    M1’s took a hit because multiple processors came out each gen. Remember: the M1 was superseded by both the Pro & the Max (and the unites but that’s not in a MacBook). By the time t…

  18. comment
    Comment #38119783

    It’s more than that. That’s just shared memory. As you say, if it was just that they it wouldn’t be noteworthy at all

  19. comment
    Comment #38080890

    Probably a balance of both tbh, as it appears to be both faster AND around the same performance per watt.

  20. comment
    Comment #38080876

    The majority of MacBooks out there are still intel based. This presentation was mostly aimed at them & M1 owners.

  21. comment
    Comment #38079688

    oh absolutely, I can't wait to see the benchmarks. Per the (non-numerical data) benchmarks in the video tho - it is faster. So... until other evidence presents itself, that's what …

  22. comment
    Comment #38079670

    2.5x is "just barely"? lol k.

  23. comment
    Comment #38079668

    Yup, exactly what I was saying.

  24. comment
    Comment #38079667

    That's... the same view, just applied to a different metric. Both would be correct . Your reading comprehension needs work, no wonder you're unconvinced when you don't even underst…

  25. comment
    Comment #38079654

    Based on what? The event video says it's faster.