Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — phoerious

phoerious

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 12:02 PM UTC
HN karma
155
Public activity
35 items

About phoerious

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #45885163

    Then it's good that we're not doing manual memory management.

  2. comment
    Comment #45885128

    Untrue. KeePassXC has large parts of UI boilerplate code and test cases. The cryptographic routines are the smallest part. They are pretty stable and don't change much. It's also n…

  3. comment
    Comment #45885121

    There is actually very little we can do about local attackers, with or without AI. All we can do is mitigate.

  4. comment
    Comment #45868231

    Our entire development process is open on GitHub. You can see where we use or accept AI at any time.

  5. comment
    Comment #45868202

    The whole purpose RLVR alignment is to ensure objectively correct outputs.

  6. comment
    Comment #45867846

    I'm just an AI researcher, what do I know?

  7. comment
    Comment #45867778

    The statement that correctness plays no role in the training process is objectively false. It's untrue for text LLMs, even more so for code LLMs. Correct would be that the training…

  8. comment
    Comment #45867661

    If we're wasting anyone's time, it's our own. Your comment reads like the AI would make up hundreds of invalid complaints, which is simply not true. You can see for yourself in our…

  9. comment
    Comment #40327535

    The extra functionality isn't opening security holes. It is central functionality that users have come to expect such as Auto-Type or support for YubiKeys. The Debian maintainer ha…

  10. comment
    Comment #39026675

    I wouldn't say it's misleading or wrong. It's certainly a bit catchy, but it also aligns with a greater discussion that's going on at the moment. Regardless of the title, most peop…

  11. comment
    Comment #39024882

    Hi, I'm lead author of the study, so I can give some background on this. This is certainly valid criticism and we could have addressed our reasoning for using Startpage in more det…

  12. comment
    Comment #39019763

    Funny you mention YouTube. We did another study on this as well. https://downloads.webis.de/publications/papers/bevendorff_20...

  13. comment
    Comment #30767171

    I clarified that on our website, since that topic comes up again and again: https://keepassxc.org/docs/#faq-general-plugins

  14. comment
    Comment #30766842

    Why do you want plugins? KeePassXC provides most of what KeePass needs plugins for out of the box in usually much better and more stable and tested quality. KeePassXC will never su…

  15. comment
    Comment #30766688

    KeePassX was abandoned years ago, which is why KeePassXC exists. KeePass is a different product and more like the original inspiration for KeePassX/XC.

  16. comment
    Comment #30765284

    KeePassX has literally been abandoned, so you will not get updates of any kind: https://www.keepassx.org/index.html%3Fp=636.html

  17. story
  18. story
  19. comment
    Comment #25998471

    The problem isn't so much the language as the fact that it's very tedious if you only have access to the old Win32 API as a result of toolchain constraints. It is much easier with …

  20. comment
    Comment #25993964

    Sounds like you should switch to KeePassXC if that's what you need.

  21. comment
    Comment #25991834

    Then it may excite you to see this: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/pull/6029

  22. story
  23. story
  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #21960565

    You guys should check out KeeShare in KeePassXC. :-)