Viewing profile — phoerious
phoerious
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 12:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 155
- Public activity
- 35 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About phoerious
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45885163
Then it's good that we're not doing manual memory management.
-
comment
Comment #45885128
Untrue. KeePassXC has large parts of UI boilerplate code and test cases. The cryptographic routines are the smallest part. They are pretty stable and don't change much. It's also n…
-
comment
Comment #45885121
There is actually very little we can do about local attackers, with or without AI. All we can do is mitigate.
-
comment
Comment #45868231
Our entire development process is open on GitHub. You can see where we use or accept AI at any time.
-
comment
Comment #45868202
The whole purpose RLVR alignment is to ensure objectively correct outputs.
-
comment
Comment #45867846
I'm just an AI researcher, what do I know?
-
comment
Comment #45867778
The statement that correctness plays no role in the training process is objectively false. It's untrue for text LLMs, even more so for code LLMs. Correct would be that the training…
-
comment
Comment #45867661
If we're wasting anyone's time, it's our own. Your comment reads like the AI would make up hundreds of invalid complaints, which is simply not true. You can see for yourself in our…
-
comment
Comment #40327535
The extra functionality isn't opening security holes. It is central functionality that users have come to expect such as Auto-Type or support for YubiKeys. The Debian maintainer ha…
-
comment
Comment #39026675
I wouldn't say it's misleading or wrong. It's certainly a bit catchy, but it also aligns with a greater discussion that's going on at the moment. Regardless of the title, most peop…
-
comment
Comment #39024882
Hi, I'm lead author of the study, so I can give some background on this. This is certainly valid criticism and we could have addressed our reasoning for using Startpage in more det…
-
comment
Comment #39019763
Funny you mention YouTube. We did another study on this as well. https://downloads.webis.de/publications/papers/bevendorff_20...
-
comment
Comment #30767171
I clarified that on our website, since that topic comes up again and again: https://keepassxc.org/docs/#faq-general-plugins
-
comment
Comment #30766842
Why do you want plugins? KeePassXC provides most of what KeePass needs plugins for out of the box in usually much better and more stable and tested quality. KeePassXC will never su…
-
comment
Comment #30766688
KeePassX was abandoned years ago, which is why KeePassXC exists. KeePass is a different product and more like the original inspiration for KeePassX/XC.
-
comment
Comment #30765284
KeePassX has literally been abandoned, so you will not get updates of any kind: https://www.keepassx.org/index.html%3Fp=636.html
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #25998471
The problem isn't so much the language as the fact that it's very tedious if you only have access to the old Win32 API as a result of toolchain constraints. It is much easier with …
-
comment
Comment #25993964
Sounds like you should switch to KeePassXC if that's what you need.
-
comment
Comment #25991834
Then it may excite you to see this: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/pull/6029
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #21960565
You guys should check out KeeShare in KeePassXC. :-)