Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — phillipsjk

phillipsjk

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 07, 2020, 6:28 AM UTC
HN karma
10
Public activity
17 items

About phillipsjk

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #22003507

    I am not holding my breath.

  2. comment
    Comment #21998238

    Correction: that was simulated testing, using scraped channel data and a LNBig blog post (about traffic statistics) to validate the results.

  3. comment
    Comment #21997162

    I guess I stand corrected on that one.

  4. comment
    Comment #21997113

    > though if you don't like them you're free to not use it. No true: due to limited block space on the base-layer. I am not convinced you get any efficiency increase with the LN: ju…

  5. comment
    Comment #21997002

    Researchers have done black-box capacity testing. It can process around 7,000 transactions per day. Even BTC can handle that volume on-chain. https://blog.dshr.org/2020/01/bitcoins…

  6. comment
    Comment #21996911

    According to a recent study, the privacy properties of the lighting Network are weak. The problem with lightning privacy is that to get good privacy you need more than about 2 hops…

  7. comment
    Comment #21991389

    You got fooled by a slick marketing campaign. Around fork time, there was a coordinated push, including websites, subreddits, youtube videos (title of video by jimmy Song interview…

  8. comment
    Comment #21991263

    Compact block were heavily inspired by Bitcoin Unlimited's "Thin Blocks".

  9. comment
    Comment #21991206

    I disagree that the LN paper made conservative assumptions. A "black swan" event like a major lightning hub going down may force more channel closings than the network (as currentl…

  10. comment
    Comment #21991179

    Unlike the base layer, the LN uses source routing: which was abandoned years ago. Requiring the endpoints to know the structure of the network graph leads to intractable routing pr…

  11. comment
    Comment #21991138

    Of course the fees would drop after raising the blocksize. The current fees are well above the marginal transaction costs of processing and storing those transactions. (I estimated…

  12. comment
    Comment #21991030

    It is called BRD wallet. (originally Bread Wallet)

  13. comment
    Comment #21977701

    Also, BSV seems to be a parody of Bitcoin Cash (BCH). You wanted large blocks? We'll give you large blocks!

  14. comment
    Comment #21977685

    Since you read the Lighting whitepaper, you know that an uncongested base-layer is assumed. The paper suggests something like 133MB blocks at scale.

  15. comment
    Comment #21977642

    On-chain scaling does not prevent that. In fact, it reduces complexity by removing the Lighting requirement. Tangent: I would not recommend running lightning on such hardware. Stat…

  16. comment
    Comment #21977556

    Blockstream (Which funds Core developers) was funded by AXA Strategic Ventures with about $80Million in two rounds. Digital Currency Group, which has investment in a lot of Bitcoin…

  17. comment
    Comment #21977498

    Scaling with second layers instead of on-chain is NOT "sound engineering" The Engineering discipline relies on empirical studies. With constantly full blocks, you have no way to me…