Viewing profile — phillipsjk
phillipsjk
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 07, 2020, 6:28 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 10
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About phillipsjk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #22003507
I am not holding my breath.
-
comment
Comment #21998238
Correction: that was simulated testing, using scraped channel data and a LNBig blog post (about traffic statistics) to validate the results.
-
comment
Comment #21997162
I guess I stand corrected on that one.
-
comment
Comment #21997113
> though if you don't like them you're free to not use it. No true: due to limited block space on the base-layer. I am not convinced you get any efficiency increase with the LN: ju…
-
comment
Comment #21997002
Researchers have done black-box capacity testing. It can process around 7,000 transactions per day. Even BTC can handle that volume on-chain. https://blog.dshr.org/2020/01/bitcoins…
-
comment
Comment #21996911
According to a recent study, the privacy properties of the lighting Network are weak. The problem with lightning privacy is that to get good privacy you need more than about 2 hops…
-
comment
Comment #21991389
You got fooled by a slick marketing campaign. Around fork time, there was a coordinated push, including websites, subreddits, youtube videos (title of video by jimmy Song interview…
-
comment
Comment #21991263
Compact block were heavily inspired by Bitcoin Unlimited's "Thin Blocks".
-
comment
Comment #21991206
I disagree that the LN paper made conservative assumptions. A "black swan" event like a major lightning hub going down may force more channel closings than the network (as currentl…
-
comment
Comment #21991179
Unlike the base layer, the LN uses source routing: which was abandoned years ago. Requiring the endpoints to know the structure of the network graph leads to intractable routing pr…
-
comment
Comment #21991138
Of course the fees would drop after raising the blocksize. The current fees are well above the marginal transaction costs of processing and storing those transactions. (I estimated…
-
comment
Comment #21991030
It is called BRD wallet. (originally Bread Wallet)
-
comment
Comment #21977701
Also, BSV seems to be a parody of Bitcoin Cash (BCH). You wanted large blocks? We'll give you large blocks!
-
comment
Comment #21977685
Since you read the Lighting whitepaper, you know that an uncongested base-layer is assumed. The paper suggests something like 133MB blocks at scale.
-
comment
Comment #21977642
On-chain scaling does not prevent that. In fact, it reduces complexity by removing the Lighting requirement. Tangent: I would not recommend running lightning on such hardware. Stat…
-
comment
Comment #21977556
Blockstream (Which funds Core developers) was funded by AXA Strategic Ventures with about $80Million in two rounds. Digital Currency Group, which has investment in a lot of Bitcoin…
-
comment
Comment #21977498
Scaling with second layers instead of on-chain is NOT "sound engineering" The Engineering discipline relies on empirical studies. With constantly full blocks, you have no way to me…