Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pfalcon

pfalcon

HN member
Joined
Sun, May 17, 2015, 5:28 PM UTC
HN karma
254
Public activity
170 items

About pfalcon

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #29200094

    > Check out the READMEs Ok. Tried https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_Spinner . >> WHAT PROBLEM DOES THIS SOLVE? Looks like too many caps in titles to me, I'm mildly scared.

  2. comment
    Comment #29200048

    If you really want to get paid for developing open source, nowadays you pretty easily can. But that likely won't be your own code.

  3. comment
    Comment #27491531

    HTML parser is trivial. There's a huge difference between HTML parser and HTML rendering engine. "A minimal browser" which you allegedly wrote isn't something you or anyone else do…

  4. comment
    Comment #26371011

    > I'd also like to see how well RISC-V is supported by Cosmpolitan. Not at all. The whole idea is based on limiting your outlook to x86_64. So, Cosmopolitan is definitely cool, but…

  5. comment
    Comment #26122548

    > for my own projects I have come to the point at avoiding python for new stuff. But who are you, do I know you? I know some guy who said that about Python and now develops his own…

  6. comment
    Comment #26122523

    > you see that it makes perfect sense for a programming language like Python, too, to make only backwards-compatible changes That's exactly what Python does of course (except when …

  7. comment
    Comment #26122514

    For as long as you're a human and belong to category of "people", you can answer that question as good as anyone else. And your answer is ...? (Just in case my answer is: https://g…

  8. comment
    Comment #26122505

    > My simple policy will be stand against any usage of this language feature in any code I write or contribute to. Dude, you're just like me! I have the same attitude towards f-stri…

  9. comment
    Comment #26099407

    The fact that you weren't even aware that 3rd-party pattern matching solutions for Python existed before, makes me hard to believe that will put your actions where your words are. …

  10. comment
    Comment #26094985

    First of all, macro systems for Python exist for decades (just as long as pattern matching, and indeed, many patmatching implementations are done as macros). One well-know example …

  11. comment
    Comment #26094910

    The Linux kernel has a document imaginatively called "stable API nonsense": https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/stable-api-... But the talk was not about that, it was …

  12. comment
    Comment #26092872

    > What's wrong with multiple implementations? It's absolutely great, and I'm saying that as someone working 5+ years on an alternative Python dialect (exactly with a motto of "down…

  13. comment
    Comment #26092785

    > I'm saying that 'case' is literally a function definition And I don't agree with saying it like that. I would agree with "a 'case' could be seen as a function definition". In oth…

  14. comment
    Comment #26092115

    > It's still hosted there on the PEP site. On the PEP site, https://www.python.org/dev/peps/ , there're a lot of deadlocked PEPs, some of them a good and better would have been wit…

  15. comment
    Comment #26091680

    As said many times already, then you have the opposite problem - how to get value from "inner" to "outer" scope. If we talk about function scope, then it requires "nonlocal" declar…

  16. comment
    Comment #26091562

    I mentioned that in other comments, and can repeat again, there were 2 choices: a) add initial pattern matching to reference Python implementation; b) throw all the work into /dev/…

  17. comment
    Comment #26087689

    Right. But the whole idea of Python scoping rules was to not burden people with the need to declare variables (instead, if you define one, it's accessible everywhere in the functio…

  18. comment
    Comment #26087544

    > Python features after 3.8 and many others. Really, after 3.8? I thought 3.5 was a golden era? > Why not put up an effort on speeding things up, removing the GIL. That's exactly w…

  19. comment
    Comment #26087531

    The poll is from end of November, there was a lot of discussions since then.

  20. comment
    Comment #26087518

    Interested in block-level scoping in Python? Please post on the python-ideas mailing list. Thanks.

  21. comment
    Comment #26087511

    If you have automatic block-level scoping, then you have the opposite problem - you need to do extra leg-work to communicate a value to the surrounding scope. Anyway, anyone agrees…

  22. comment
    Comment #26087501

    Interested in block-level scoping in Python? Please post on the python-ideas mailing list. Thanks.

  23. comment
    Comment #26087491

    Interested in block-level scoping in Python? Please post on the python-ideas mailing list. Thanks.

  24. comment
    Comment #26087488

    Thus, will be fixed sooner or later. (Sad it's not fixed right away, but neither me nor you proposed patches.)

  25. comment
    Comment #26087471

    Exactly, Elixir is usually the only example given. So, how it makes sense to blame Python here is unclear. There's a proposal to add similar "sigils" to Python pattern matching, it…