Viewing profile — petereisentraut
petereisentraut
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 09, 2016, 1:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 220
- Public activity
- 33 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About petereisentraut
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45952712
The problem with this and similar requests is that it would change the identifier scoping in incompatible ways and therefore potentially break a lot of existing SQL code.
-
comment
Comment #45952691
The working group also discussed ORDER BY ALL, but for some reason most participants really did not like it.
-
comment
Comment #45952680
This was also discussed at the last SQL WG meeting but was postponed for further refinement. But it’s likely to be added soon.
- story
-
comment
Comment #41239180
Git 2.38.0 is the version where git archive uses an internal gzip implementation instead of calling the actual external gzip. This internal implementation has two improvements for …
-
comment
Comment #41239118
The configure generated from configure.ac has always been checked into Git for PostgreSQL. So with either the old or the new make dist approach, the configure in the tarball matche…
-
comment
Comment #36175956
> - Support for deferring NOT NULL and CHECK constraints to the end of a transaction (just ran into this problem yesterday) I'm curious what the use case of this is? Deferrable con…
-
comment
Comment #32054944
> Care to explain why you think NULLS DISTINCT is the "right" default behavior? What problems does it solve to warrant additional complexity by default? It's the most consistent wi…
-
comment
Comment #32054151
I am the author of this feature. The background here is that the SQL standard was ambiguous about which of the two ways an implementation should behave. So in the upcoming SQL:202x…
-
comment
Comment #24579607
It's a bit more complicated than that. You will also notice another release note item in PG13 that says "Allow inserts, not only updates and deletes, to trigger vacuuming activity …
-
comment
Comment #23259388
Sure they can. See example here: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-transactions...
-
comment
Comment #21134706
This is also much faster than the equivalent using a PL/pgSQL trigger.
-
comment
Comment #21004705
A snapshot is actually just a struct with a few transaction IDs (xids) and some other bookkeeping that describes which slice of the physically stored data is supposed to be visible…
-
comment
Comment #20393772
Caps Lock is already mapped to Control.
-
comment
Comment #19541872
The problem with this is that time zone definitions change, both in the future because of political and administrative changes, as well as in the past, when mistakes are corrected.…
-
comment
Comment #18248810
Right. It will probably be enabled by default in PostgreSQL 12.
-
comment
Comment #17146666
You also cannot run VACUUM inside a DO block. It's the same thing underneath.
-
comment
Comment #17146658
Now is the time to test this. From my early experiments, you can expect to get speedups for queries that last longer than a few seconds. A lot depends on whether I/O, caching, etc.…
-
comment
Comment #17146567
Feature author here. Running not-allowed-in-transaction-block DDL, such as VACUUM, still won't work in stored procedures. Room for future improvement.
-
comment
Comment #17146545
The release notes say Amit Khandekar. (I don't know him.)
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #16344411
Try OmniDB perhaps? (disclaimer: my employer (but open source))
-
comment
Comment #16344403
Another problem is that the bool provided by stdbool.h is 4 bytes on some platforms, which breaks PostgreSQL all over the place.
-
comment
Comment #15352508
It has to do with how the tuple header that stores the metadata is designed. See comments here: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f...