Viewing profile — periodontal
periodontal
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 08, 2015, 4:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 82
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About periodontal
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46435722
For an easy strategy, guess all zeros at first. Call resulting distance E1 and let S1 = E1 × E1. Now guess with X = 1, rest still zero, obtaining S2. We can calculate X = (S1 - S2 …
-
comment
Comment #33534844
This is probably due to the underlying filesystem being case insensitive on Mac. As a hack, you can create a symlink alias on a per repo basis. ln -s HEAD .git/head
-
comment
Comment #32140304
Basically, hash all your data items, keep track of the maximum number of leading 0 bits seen in a hash so far. This is a decent proxy (but not without error) for how many distinct …
-
comment
Comment #29831741
You might also try maximum instead of average. This is minimax and represents worst case scenarios for each guess. This is mostly useful for optimal play against an opponent (which…
-
comment
Comment #29185207
You can get something somewhat similar with "always create merge commit" workflows (no fast forward) and changing your tooling to look at the first-parent-history by default. This …
-
comment
Comment #24520035
For bash, add quotes: "${cmd[@]}" Otherwise, you'll get word splitting. E.g., cmd=( test "!= !=" != "" ) "${cmd[@]}" && echo Success ${cmd[@]} || echo Failure
-
comment
Comment #24312300
Due to the Leidenfrost effect, incidental contact of bare skin and LN2 is not usually a problem (it boils off locally and creates a gaseous N2 barrier). Other things superchilled b…
-
comment
Comment #23576140
Of course, even your example units don't always behave like you want. For velocities, 150 megameters/second + 150 megameters/second ≈ 240 megameters/second.
-
comment
Comment #14805961
This is a specific example of an Exact cover problem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_cover If you haven't seen Knuth's Dancing Links implementation of Algorithm X, I highly re…
-
comment
Comment #11971985
If the extra initial scrutiny is perceived to streamline the process and avoid further hassles, many will hand it over without giving it a second thought. For example, many people …
-
comment
Comment #11599016
2147483647 + 1 is congruent to -2147483648 modulo 4294967296.
-
comment
Comment #11126450
The same way we create and vet conventional cryptography: withstanding public scrutiny of experts until we are reasonably confident that there are no major issues. Most attacks are…
-
comment
Comment #11121641
It's certainly possible to design such a system with external firmware and still allow for secure updates. The enclave would store (in secured storage) a hash of the last used firm…
-
comment
Comment #11120618
The reasoning there is far from conclusive. The argument is that the secure enclave has been updated in the past (to lengthen enforced delays) without wiping user keys. However, wi…
-
comment
Comment #11094716
While theoretically possible, it'll be very difficult to realize physically. If you allow fractal constructions, purely unrectifiable sets can fit the bill. For example, here's an …
-
comment
Comment #11081801
They destroyed it ostensibly so that they had a stronger guarantee that that GUID would never be generated again. That said, I suspect they understood it wasn't strictly necessary …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #10794415
Per-user voting history in many (most?) states. The fact that a ballot was received from a particular voter (but not what they voted for) is often releasable under public disclosur…
-
comment
Comment #10765072
I agree that the oracle of hindsight can often lead us astray. However, in 2007, it wasn't just known that you could implement a backdoor, but how to do so. This of course means th…
-
comment
Comment #10764831
The backdoor possibility was known in 2007 and the standard included a way to set your own constants (which no one used, true, but just because it was true for Dual EC in general).…
-
comment
Comment #10764796
Basically, Dual EC is never something you'll choose willingly, given alternatives (it's quite slow and has had a slight bias demonstrated). So no one* did in practice. This made th…
-
comment
Comment #10764741
> This backdoor appears to swap out the public key, which is something NSA has no interest in doing. While they wouldn't need to swap it out (since they can unlock standard Dual EC…
-
comment
Comment #10377167
See the last section (Afterword: removing the hat): First, in case this is not obvious to the reader, we do not actually endorse the attacker's perspective. Our goal in analyzing t…
-
comment
Comment #10377118
One point this doesn't (appear to) consider is the type of vulnerability which is possible to embed. Forcing a curve parameter with the prefix 0xBADA55 is eminently feasible given …
-
comment
Comment #10105039
PFS will make it so connections need to be individually attacked but since most PFS is done with Diffie-Hellman variants (susceptible to Shor's algorithm), the group size also need…