Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pepesza

pepesza

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jun 09, 2016, 12:13 PM UTC
HN karma
94
Public activity
29 items

About pepesza

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/pepesha; my proof: https://keybase.io/pepesha/sigs/zLObvlqrpKBqgxPypWrnTq1UYlPzi0x_81-dCEdAKWM ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30439864

    Bitcoin the network is fully transparent, which makes BTC not really fungible - it can and is traced, which creates better/worse BTC. This is why coinbase (small c) BTC is sold at …

  2. comment
    Comment #30324798

    Financial privacy is a must-have, not a nice-to-have feature. Financial privacy does not prevent one from being able to pay taxes. But it definitely prevents this type of attacks.

  3. comment
    Comment #30288057

    Telegram does not have any meaningful e2e encryption (apart from 1-1 on-demand stuff nobody uses). So yes, everything is visible to Telegram.

  4. comment
    Comment #30189818

    You are welcome! ZKSnarks are really mind-bending tech and are a lot of fun!

  5. comment
    Comment #30136333

    1) pepesza finds "42424242" 2) Signature = sign("42424242", privk_pepesza) 3) Witness = Circuit("42424242", Signature, pubk_pepesza). `Circuit` program will validate things I've me…

  6. comment
    Comment #30112343

    The trick is to sign the secret, not the proof. And than to prove inside the circuit following claims: 1) secret (provided as a hidden input) is correct a solution to the puzzle 2)…

  7. comment
    Comment #30101923

    I think we are talking about three different scenarios. You are describing attribution problem. "Solution to the puzzle is no longer a secret, it is a public knowledge. Who was the…

  8. comment
    Comment #30098413

    Why would it? Both signatures and snarks are non-interactive. And since you prove any(*) computation with a snark, you can prove that computation that verifies something (signature…

  9. comment
    Comment #30092160

    There are multiple ways of pulling this off. Signatures are zk-proof systems, just a very specialized ones. So you do it every time you sign a message. See my other comment on how …

  10. comment
    Comment #30091930

    > Does such a mechanism exist? Sign the puzzle solution with your private key. Check signature inside the circuit. This obviously can't be applied to this particular game since it …

  11. comment
    Comment #24292004

    Think of Kessler syndrome. One can imagine that blowing (small) N of them would create a cloud of shrapnel posing danger for the whole network. Birds are on really low orbits, so i…

  12. comment
    Comment #24176992

    Coming from Erlang to Elixir - I find Elixir docs lacking in both coverage and terseness.

  13. comment
    Comment #21544903

    Don't give them any info. Write something along the lines of "transfer of money", always. Use separate channel to communicate "why". Every bit of information you give them will be …

  14. comment
    Comment #21047075

    Technically unfeasible considering how much time he had to go through those docs (likely - very little).

  15. comment
    Comment #19192157

    > It's interesting how something which was built on the idea of decentralization by design has given way to a clear power structure, where those who have the sway to control the fa…

  16. comment
    Comment #19192136

    Monero, Zcash, Grin. Three designs that are based on different cryptography - all three giving user full privacy.

  17. comment
    Comment #19192107

    Visa is very expensive. How about that?

  18. comment
    Comment #19019043

    Not all cryptocurrencies add public record. Examples: ZCash, Grin.

  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #18814212

    They are doing beacon chain (a distributed unbiasable verifiable random number generator, constructed using commit-reveal scheme + VDF to fix commit-reveal biasability) to choose s…

  21. comment
    Comment #17540415

    Offtopic. DLT is basically a marketing fraud. Both "permissioned" and "permissionless" DLT are packed into one term. Problem is - they are vastly different. Permissioned DLT is not…

  22. comment
    Comment #14977138

    Plasma is not for payments. It is a counterpart of Lightning Network, but for code. With LN you can do a lot of extremely cheap payments. With Plasma you can do the same for arbitr…

  23. comment
    Comment #13908813

    You can do Proof of Authority instead of Proof of Work to cut down costs. The real reason behind techniques such as PoW instead of just Distributed Byzantine Fault Tolerance algori…

  24. comment
    Comment #12159077

    Those will be addressed with Lighting Network [0]. ATM there are ~4 implementations of the concept. None is complete/mature yet. [0] - http://lightning.network/

  25. comment
    Comment #12148696

    Because encryption without authentication is prone to MITM attacks. WebTRC does not have auth layer.