Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — penny500

penny500

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 19, 2013, 8:19 AM UTC
HN karma
37
Public activity
81 items

About penny500

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #5548708

    There's no reply button for me underneath your threads initially until some time passes. I guess that's how HN works for some. I'll respond to your latest comment here. > If you sa…

  2. comment
    Comment #5548618

    tiredofcareer, thanks for calling me stupid. This conversation has surely turned professional. It's quite funny when you espouse economically illiterate statements, then question t…

  3. comment
    Comment #5548531

    This is completely economically illiterate. China is a developing country. As a result, it uses less electricity than its developed counterparts. As China grows, it will be using m…

  4. comment
    Comment #5548511

    Do you have a more objective source?

  5. comment
    Comment #5548473

    Calm down. No one put words into his mouth. You, however, did put words into my mouth, which I find quite astonishing. Those windmills currently cover 1 million people. The world h…

  6. comment
    Comment #5548423

    Denmark's population is smaller than New York City by a couple million. The US would need a massive, massive number of windmills.

  7. comment
    Comment #5548348

    What would incentivize people to actually go into research if that were the case? Our best would all be bankers, lawyers, and mobile app developers.

  8. comment
    Comment #5542693

    Are you serious? Just because you're not Keynesian, it doesn't mean you do not believe in a central bank. Milton Friedman believed in a central bank.

  9. comment
    Comment #5541978

    "mainstream media" != "mainstream economists" I'd prefer the opinions of PhD economists with a special emphasis on currency transactions over yours or anyone else's, actually.

  10. comment
    Comment #5541832

    Mainstream economists aren't central planners. I don't mean just economists from both administrations. I meant mainstream economists from every school on the US News and beyond.

  11. comment
    Comment #5541794

    Can you elaborate on your thesis so I know what you're specifically referring to?

  12. comment
    Comment #5541784

    That's not how quantitative easing works. Quantitative easing doesn't fire up the printing presses. Bernanke can add $2 trillion into the system within 15 minutes, and no paper mon…

  13. comment
    Comment #5541728

    "It is being used as a currency" Do you have a source for this? As far as I know, and I know this is a theory but I suspect a good theory, people used bitcoin as a currency when it…

  14. comment
    Comment #5541693

    Once you secure the system however, the costs of increasing currency into that system is trivial.

  15. comment
    Comment #5541646

    Krugman isn't being a political partisan hack here. Every mainstream economist from the Republican and Democratic administrations agree that a currency backed similarly to gold (as…

  16. comment
    Comment #5541630

    How much does it cost to change bits of data on a computer? That's what happens with quantitative easing. Bernanke isn't calling up the printing presses to print $2 trillion in pap…

  17. comment
    Comment #5541619

    It's certainly not being used as a currency, its original intention. It's being used by speculators to get rich. Sure you might find a few examples of buyers and sellers using bitc…

  18. comment
    Comment #5541439

    What specific law are you referring to that forces Main Street to invest in 401Ks?

  19. comment
    Comment #5540388

    That's how Wall Street works. You give money to Wall Street, and Wall Street in turn chooses to distribute the money to technology or research companies like Google or Merck (or ev…

  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #5540333

    "There are always 2 parties to each transaction and one makes the money that the other one loses." Completely false. Wealth is not fixed. There can be two winners, which often happ…

  22. comment
    Comment #5540305

    Mainstream economists believe in free markets, and they also understand market failures and moral hazard. Government failure also exists.

  23. comment
    Comment #5540258

    Because for Wall Street to succeed, Main Street must fail? Why would Main Street transact with them at all if that were the case?

  24. comment
    Comment #5540222

    Well, you'd have to increase the salaries of Congress to that level, and that is probably politically unfeasible.

  25. comment
    Comment #5540179

    How is "regulation makes us less competitive" a straw man argument? If your Singaporean or European competitors operate under a set of different and less stringent rules, that woul…