Viewing profile — penny500
penny500
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 19, 2013, 8:19 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 37
- Public activity
- 81 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About penny500
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #5548708
There's no reply button for me underneath your threads initially until some time passes. I guess that's how HN works for some. I'll respond to your latest comment here. > If you sa…
-
comment
Comment #5548618
tiredofcareer, thanks for calling me stupid. This conversation has surely turned professional. It's quite funny when you espouse economically illiterate statements, then question t…
-
comment
Comment #5548531
This is completely economically illiterate. China is a developing country. As a result, it uses less electricity than its developed counterparts. As China grows, it will be using m…
-
comment
Comment #5548511
Do you have a more objective source?
-
comment
Comment #5548473
Calm down. No one put words into his mouth. You, however, did put words into my mouth, which I find quite astonishing. Those windmills currently cover 1 million people. The world h…
-
comment
Comment #5548423
Denmark's population is smaller than New York City by a couple million. The US would need a massive, massive number of windmills.
-
comment
Comment #5548348
What would incentivize people to actually go into research if that were the case? Our best would all be bankers, lawyers, and mobile app developers.
-
comment
Comment #5542693
Are you serious? Just because you're not Keynesian, it doesn't mean you do not believe in a central bank. Milton Friedman believed in a central bank.
-
comment
Comment #5541978
"mainstream media" != "mainstream economists" I'd prefer the opinions of PhD economists with a special emphasis on currency transactions over yours or anyone else's, actually.
-
comment
Comment #5541832
Mainstream economists aren't central planners. I don't mean just economists from both administrations. I meant mainstream economists from every school on the US News and beyond.
-
comment
Comment #5541794
Can you elaborate on your thesis so I know what you're specifically referring to?
-
comment
Comment #5541784
That's not how quantitative easing works. Quantitative easing doesn't fire up the printing presses. Bernanke can add $2 trillion into the system within 15 minutes, and no paper mon…
-
comment
Comment #5541728
"It is being used as a currency" Do you have a source for this? As far as I know, and I know this is a theory but I suspect a good theory, people used bitcoin as a currency when it…
-
comment
Comment #5541693
Once you secure the system however, the costs of increasing currency into that system is trivial.
-
comment
Comment #5541646
Krugman isn't being a political partisan hack here. Every mainstream economist from the Republican and Democratic administrations agree that a currency backed similarly to gold (as…
-
comment
Comment #5541630
How much does it cost to change bits of data on a computer? That's what happens with quantitative easing. Bernanke isn't calling up the printing presses to print $2 trillion in pap…
-
comment
Comment #5541619
It's certainly not being used as a currency, its original intention. It's being used by speculators to get rich. Sure you might find a few examples of buyers and sellers using bitc…
-
comment
Comment #5541439
What specific law are you referring to that forces Main Street to invest in 401Ks?
-
comment
Comment #5540388
That's how Wall Street works. You give money to Wall Street, and Wall Street in turn chooses to distribute the money to technology or research companies like Google or Merck (or ev…
-
comment
Comment #5540358
How so?
-
comment
Comment #5540333
"There are always 2 parties to each transaction and one makes the money that the other one loses." Completely false. Wealth is not fixed. There can be two winners, which often happ…
-
comment
Comment #5540305
Mainstream economists believe in free markets, and they also understand market failures and moral hazard. Government failure also exists.
-
comment
Comment #5540258
Because for Wall Street to succeed, Main Street must fail? Why would Main Street transact with them at all if that were the case?
-
comment
Comment #5540222
Well, you'd have to increase the salaries of Congress to that level, and that is probably politically unfeasible.
-
comment
Comment #5540179
How is "regulation makes us less competitive" a straw man argument? If your Singaporean or European competitors operate under a set of different and less stringent rules, that woul…