Viewing profile — peakok
peakok
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 21, 2008, 8:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 460
- Public activity
- 92 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About peakok
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #425083
There is a hypocrisy in libertarianism à la Mises. When you read his hyper-logical texts (wich should be appealing to the HN crowd btw), he claims that we should remove any sort of…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #420943
I'm sorry if I sounded offensive, and I indeed was, I was tired when I wrote my last comment and my words didn't reflect my tought. I'd like to elucidate this problem once and for …
-
comment
Comment #420463
"Somebody is wrong on the internet". I'm wasting my time and this is my last answer. If you haven't noticed, I only use strict mathematical arguments and I invite you to do the sam…
-
comment
Comment #419535
This is the reason I'm buying the less possible games from Steam, because I know Valve could be bought buy Google or EA some day, and you have no control over it . You have absolut…
-
comment
Comment #419247
If you include m and f in the universe of possibilities, then you must add the following combinations as well : 7) m/f 8) f/m You are not allowed to skip arbitrarily some of the co…
-
comment
Comment #418941
Basically you're right, and Paul is right too. This is just a matter of convention, it depends on what you want to hear in the question. If Jeff said "one of the children is a girl…
-
comment
Comment #418894
Ok this thread is confusing. Actually, your second algorithm wasn't the point of my argument. You're right that according to your second formulation, the probability is 1/2, of cou…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #418836
I'm willing to bet $5 that the probability (according to the current statistical science corpus) is still 2/3 (even if you're right that announcing the child doesn't alter the sex …
-
comment
Comment #418800
This is precisely the first subtility you encounter when you learn probabilities : they are not identical. Paul is right that the formulation of the question doesn't refer to the M…
-
comment
Comment #418783
You are right about the question ("Announcing the gender of one child does not magically alter the gender of the other child"), but wrong about the statistics, even in your second …
-
comment
Comment #413022
I'm French and I know Todd, the title sounds correct to me. Todd predicted the collapse of USSR (when it was a minority position among intellectuals), and it has been several years…
-
comment
Comment #402374
I don't know why you're being downvoted. It's cool for the guy, but I found the speeches of Obama completely dull as well. Maybe the talent resides in writing speeches that will of…
-
comment
Comment #395863
I might be downmodded to hell with this message, but whatever... I feel about the same. Do you have some sort of nobility in your ancestorship (or in the army) ? I noted that this …
-
comment
Comment #393788
I'm French and I enjoyed the article. This Loic LeMeur guy has always been a self-proclaimed ambassador of whatever he wants, but he's just blow hard. He needs the bad press so he'…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #388109
A = You have a good sperm B = You are intelligent In logic, the argument translates to : A B ( quality of sperm depends on your intelligence ), B A ( and vice versa, intelligence d…
-
comment
Comment #387433
The quality of a man’s sperm depends on how intelligent he is, and vice versa It is unfortunate that an article talking about intelligence starts with a tautology.
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #385871
yes.
-
comment
Comment #381747
Interesting, but definitly not surprising. When I was younger I found a way to hack a poorly designed online quizz, tied to a very famous french radio quizz. It was pay per play, w…
-
comment
Comment #359986
So true. Even with the best spam filter in the world, I'll always have to check for false-positive. We need something else...
-
comment
Comment #359147
What is the adsense of life ?