Viewing profile — pdubbs90
pdubbs90
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 13, 2016, 10:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pdubbs90
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19618812
> their published probabilities are predictions for what would happen if the event occurred today. This is manifestly untrue. For the 2016 election 538 had a "Now-cast" that they v…
-
comment
Comment #16594501
"People are jealous" seems to me like the uncharitable formulation. I'd phrase it more along the lines of: "we evolved in small tribes and are more acutely aware of relative status…
-
comment
Comment #16594444
In their model the only benefit of talent is it makes you more likely to double your wealth given luck. This means that they assume luck is needed for advancement while talent is n…
-
comment
Comment #16594343
Their model is if you have a lucky event you have P(talent) chance of doubling your capital and if you hit an unlucky event your capital is halved. Any step in time where you neith…
-
comment
Comment #15827620
Can't speak for many professions, but a long series of interviews where you do a bunch of modules and meet a large proportion of your team is pretty typical in consulting.
-
comment
Comment #15417029
This is missing the last point of my argument though. Paid professionals like those that build Photoshop or Google are filtered by the hiring process. Steemit (and I assume Woyano …
-
comment
Comment #15413554
Maybe the distinction lies in the filtering. Stackoverflow and Wikipedia have high quality because only people that really care about a subject (and thus usually know a lot) will i…
-
comment
Comment #15378122
I think the key distinction here is between “intolerance” and refusal of services. No one should be going out of their way to hear or publish the Nazi point of view, and people oug…
-
comment
Comment #14849522
This is why I said "seem." Everything has some bias, but I think foreign publications usually have a less-relevant-to-me bias, which is about as close to unbiased as I can get.
-
comment
Comment #14843863
I find the BBC and the Economist good for this reason. They are/seem a lot less biased than U.S. stuff through some combination of higher standards and that they'd rather manipulat…
-
comment
Comment #14295371
The map shows life expectancy at birth, so healthy people moving from rural areas to cities shouldn't effect it.
-
comment
Comment #14135707
Do you have any examples of this? This is the first I've heard of it.
-
comment
Comment #13108089
I feel like disappointing research is going to be a given when you have such an obvious conflict. The author has a strong motivation to make Zestimates seem bad (the less reliable …
-
comment
Comment #12969882
Fake news is a real problem, but this seems like an unfair no-win for Facebook from major media outlets. When they had more human editors on trending topics it was "Facebook is inj…
-
comment
Comment #11407755
I'm very glad that where she wrote "Multiply that 0.6 percent chance of getting any given job by the 10 or so appropriate positions in the entire world, and you have about that sam…