Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pcaharrier

pcaharrier

HN member
Joined
Thu, Apr 14, 2022, 12:55 PM UTC
HN karma
709
Public activity
186 items

About pcaharrier

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #47182766

    The ruling is strictly limited to whether a private citizen can sue the federal government for money damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). It does not legalize the inte…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #47073475

    I actually think the law isn't terrible (at least not as far as state stalking laws go), but the argument that his lawyer (or the petitioner himself; it's not clear whether he was …

  5. comment
    Comment #47064119

    "a crank who got a new neighbours who live differently than he does, and he doesn’t like it." Many such cases, if my previous work experience in the criminal justice system is any …

  6. comment
    Comment #47061566

    Yes, even where there is no physical trespass, there very well may be other torts or crimes. Obviously, if you set fire to your neighbor's house, you can't get out of an arson char…

  7. comment
    Comment #47061123

    Bottom line: light can be a common law nuisance, but it doesn't (without more) constitute stalking.

  8. story
  9. story
  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #46918543

    Yes, but only if the judge who gets the case believes in silly things like "Federal Rules of Evidence."

  12. comment
    Comment #46771648

    The website itself is here and I find it fascinating to put the translations side-by-side: https://www.iliadtranslations.com/

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #46620693

    And even then . . . https://ij.org/if-you-break-it-you-buy-it-unless-youre-the-p...

  15. comment
    Comment #46620662

    As long as there's probable cause for some crime, the subjective motivations of the officer are almost never going to enter the legal analysis. Whren v. United States[1] was a case…

  16. comment
    Comment #46620340

    Let's call it "extremely difficult" - https://ij.org/if-you-break-it-you-buy-it-unless-youre-the-p...

  17. comment
    Comment #46618248

    >So in this case the government is raiding the home of someone who did not commit any crime, in the hopes of getting at people who might have. I looked at a lot of search warrant a…

  18. comment
    Comment #46555399

    I think this (from near the end) is also noteworthy (based on the two quotes from the late Justice Scalia at the beginning of the article): >Still another point illustrated by Just…

  19. comment
    Comment #46555307

    Questions, yes, but specifically questions about the facts in the video (not merely "what should happen to the protesters or police?"). "As one would expect, these differences in c…

  20. story
  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #46356728

    I don’t think Butterick is claiming SaaS doesn’t exist. He’s setting boundary cases for an economic argument about distributed software. SaaS isn’t an endpoint in that model; it si…

  23. comment
    Comment #46355093

    Provocative title notwithstanding, it seems like the author's core argument is correct: "to the extent that it doesn’t influ­ence economic choices, piracy does not exist."

  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #46318837

    "it's why books like Mein Kampf or Lolita don't also show up on these lists despite being very intentionally kept off the shelves by librarians." It seems like they would count tho…