Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pbzcnepu

pbzcnepu

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jun 04, 2020, 4:52 PM UTC
HN karma
57
Public activity
18 items

About pbzcnepu

investigating the world of computer architecture academia

https://pbzcnepu.net/

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #41419074

    maybe if IEEE wanted to keep students, they could support them, unlike during the 2019 ISCA peer review fraud incident where an IEEE fellow was caught in peer review fraud that lea…

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #26896868

    you should notice that the professor involved is listed as being on the Program Committee for IEEE S&P 2022 already, meaning he must be well-connected with various higher ups at th…

  4. comment
    Comment #26896831

    if they release a statement as fast as they did for the ISCA'19 peer review fraud case you might be waiting a while (took more or less 2 years)

  5. comment
    Comment #26215610

    for more details than you possibly want go here: https://pbzcnepu.net/isca/timeline.html though it is more about the ACM/IEEE side of things rather than what was going on in Florid…

  6. comment
    Comment #26214517

    also, at ISCA'19, over half the papers were PC papers, meaning they were papers where one of the authors was on the committee that picked which papers get in. It's probably why the…

  7. comment
    Comment #26214054

    ISCA is a particularly horrible "top" conference. We've been trying to reproduce some papers with questionable methodology from ISCA'20 (including using "1 cycle access L1 cache" i…

  8. comment
    Comment #26213962

    the IEEE probably won't do anything. We've been trying for 2 years to even get an e-mail reply from them on the issue, let alone say anything useful. See the whole story here: http…

  9. comment
    Comment #26072226

    For a full rundown of the history of this incident see: https://pbzcnepu.net/isca/timeline.html

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #23485285

    it's anecdotal. another anecdote, when first trying to raise awareness of the issue, when mentioning it to members of the community I never got the response "wow, how could this ha…

  12. comment
    Comment #23485263

    > If you don't want cycle-accurate simulator based papers, you'd have to eliminate a large variety of body of work only possible with this approach. yes. Most "cycle-accurate" resu…

  13. comment
    Comment #23473382

    it isn't always that the work is bad, it's just the review process for getting in has always seemed to be easier for people with the right connections. Not necessarily in an overt …

  14. comment
    Comment #23473329

    well let's take Torrellas. Check out the two papers at ISCA'20 with him as an author. Both use modified "cycle-accurate" simulators for the results. For now let's ignore all the is…

  15. comment
    Comment #23468695

    there's really not much one can do. In Comp Arch, most of the honest people left the field years ago because they got sick of all this nonsense. Most were happy to let those left b…

  16. comment
    Comment #23463620

    The program officers were contacted, leading to the OIG being notified on 6 December 2019 and supposedly an investigation was openened, but we have not heard anything back since th…

  17. comment
    Comment #23462702

    some of us made a big effort to get anyone at the IEEE or ACM to care about this ISCA'19 incident. The initial investigation by Torrellas was run mostly by ISCA insiders with confl…

  18. story