Viewing profile — pbzcnepu
pbzcnepu
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 04, 2020, 4:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 57
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pbzcnepu
https://pbzcnepu.net/
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41419074
maybe if IEEE wanted to keep students, they could support them, unlike during the 2019 ISCA peer review fraud incident where an IEEE fellow was caught in peer review fraud that lea…
- story
-
comment
Comment #26896868
you should notice that the professor involved is listed as being on the Program Committee for IEEE S&P 2022 already, meaning he must be well-connected with various higher ups at th…
-
comment
Comment #26896831
if they release a statement as fast as they did for the ISCA'19 peer review fraud case you might be waiting a while (took more or less 2 years)
-
comment
Comment #26215610
for more details than you possibly want go here: https://pbzcnepu.net/isca/timeline.html though it is more about the ACM/IEEE side of things rather than what was going on in Florid…
-
comment
Comment #26214517
also, at ISCA'19, over half the papers were PC papers, meaning they were papers where one of the authors was on the committee that picked which papers get in. It's probably why the…
-
comment
Comment #26214054
ISCA is a particularly horrible "top" conference. We've been trying to reproduce some papers with questionable methodology from ISCA'20 (including using "1 cycle access L1 cache" i…
-
comment
Comment #26213962
the IEEE probably won't do anything. We've been trying for 2 years to even get an e-mail reply from them on the issue, let alone say anything useful. See the whole story here: http…
-
comment
Comment #26072226
For a full rundown of the history of this incident see: https://pbzcnepu.net/isca/timeline.html
- story
-
comment
Comment #23485285
it's anecdotal. another anecdote, when first trying to raise awareness of the issue, when mentioning it to members of the community I never got the response "wow, how could this ha…
-
comment
Comment #23485263
> If you don't want cycle-accurate simulator based papers, you'd have to eliminate a large variety of body of work only possible with this approach. yes. Most "cycle-accurate" resu…
-
comment
Comment #23473382
it isn't always that the work is bad, it's just the review process for getting in has always seemed to be easier for people with the right connections. Not necessarily in an overt …
-
comment
Comment #23473329
well let's take Torrellas. Check out the two papers at ISCA'20 with him as an author. Both use modified "cycle-accurate" simulators for the results. For now let's ignore all the is…
-
comment
Comment #23468695
there's really not much one can do. In Comp Arch, most of the honest people left the field years ago because they got sick of all this nonsense. Most were happy to let those left b…
-
comment
Comment #23463620
The program officers were contacted, leading to the OIG being notified on 6 December 2019 and supposedly an investigation was openened, but we have not heard anything back since th…
-
comment
Comment #23462702
some of us made a big effort to get anyone at the IEEE or ACM to care about this ISCA'19 incident. The initial investigation by Torrellas was run mostly by ISCA insiders with confl…
- story