Viewing profile — pavfarb
pavfarb
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 31, 2017, 7:46 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 68
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About pavfarb
Interested in serious engineering causes, like "will self-driving driving cars and AI eliminate humanity earlier than poor JS code running power plants because some VC capitalist thought either of those is a great idea".
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #14191400
So that's why Taleb deadlifts like a madman.
-
comment
Comment #13821847
The way I see it, Acra combines rather unique security guarantees in a very elegant way. More precise questions could fruit more precise answers, though
-
comment
Comment #13821614
Woohoo! I am one of the engineers behind the project, and can answer questions if anyone has any.
-
comment
Comment #13806138
"built-in JSON serializer/deserializer" near "closures" and "coroutines (via fibers)" feels a bit.. odd. Sign of the times, I understand, but still. Apart from this boring grumblin…
-
comment
Comment #13772173
If we could avoid doing so - we would, because we understand how hard earned Go's guarantees are. But, things are the way they are.
-
comment
Comment #13772165
But, as he says, 'sometimes you have to'. This is a time like this.
-
comment
Comment #13772153
Well, it is true: it was interesting side effect that 'just worked', we were like 'hmm, if GC is able to control external memory allocation, well, fine, maybe Go is even better tha…
- story
-
comment
Comment #13757681
It would, but the place where these techniques are helpful the most (untyped languages with problematic input sanitization) are the languages for which hurting intermediary perform…
-
comment
Comment #13742918
Not so, regular engineers should write, it's a question of what they write. I'm a regular engineer, my colleagues are as regular boring folks as possible, yet we're writing stuff f…
-
comment
Comment #13736329
>I actually miss the days when engineers blogged more rather than accumulating karma on Stackoverflow. 100% hit. I do write sometimes on StackOverflow to give back some help to the…
-
comment
Comment #13736315
It's really unfortunate that people do read my comment as "engineers shouldn't write". Engineers should write. I actually write a lot of stuff, because I like it. There are some pi…
-
comment
Comment #13736290
Writing is, publishing and noising the channels isn't. I'm afraid I find experimentation like that at cost of other people's time and attention to be a bit petty crime.
-
comment
Comment #13733918
Engineers should blog publicly when they have something to say. Something useful for their colleagues. Engineers shouldn't waste time forcing themselves to blog instead of work jus…
-
comment
Comment #13728387
If we think that intentional collision is not a threat vector, while, as life shows, it is: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168774#c23
-
comment
Comment #13713957
Now I really wonder what will happen to Git we all know and love.
-
comment
Comment #13713940
SHA1 use cases are not limited into integrity verification of documents, but used a lot for traffic integrity and generation of authentication codes: - Torrents of all kinds. - Ver…
-
comment
Comment #13694903
The whole idea of relying core security guarantee (provable 'no knowledge' on server side) on unreliable mechanism (in-browser cryptography) is feels really wrong. There are many s…
-
comment
Comment #13661841
Much cryptographic agility such wow (can't resist, like, every time I see another OpenSSL bug like this).