Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — paulnechifor

paulnechifor

HN member
Joined
Sun, Dec 23, 2012, 2:32 PM UTC
HN karma
243
Public activity
154 items

About paulnechifor

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #25739652

    That's the case for protected classes. I just think it should be expanded. It shouldn't be that way if media companies weren't coordinating behind the scenes to ban stuff together.…

  3. comment
    Comment #25739551

    :) Political opinions are more well-defined? At least political opinions are in realm of reality.

  4. comment
    Comment #25739507

    As an individual, when your speech is banned, it's all the same whether it's by an authoritarian government or by private companies.

  5. comment
    Comment #25739435

    That's exactly the argument for GDPR is. If an American megacorp doesn't want to respect the rights of non Americans then it shouldn't be allowed to profit at all from them. You ca…

  6. comment
    Comment #25739348

    The freedom of individuals is more important than the freedom of corporations. When the freedom of people to speak clashes with the freedom of corporations to not allow that speech…

  7. comment
    Comment #25739211

    I don't see that as a good counter example. That sort of content should be illegal anyway.

  8. comment
    Comment #25739119

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/17/business/media/ronan-farr...

  9. comment
    Comment #25738784

    It was coordinated behind locked doors with Google and Apple which are competitors.

  10. comment
    Comment #25738692

    All companies shutting them down without so much as a hearing in court will probably lead them to build parallel societies.

  11. comment
    Comment #25738616

    AWS's response was based on its legal right to shut down every customer it is biased against. Nothing was adjudicated in court.

  12. comment
    Comment #25738561

    Free speech approved by media giants. Everything else will be blockaded.

  13. comment
    Comment #25738432

    Political opinions should be a protected class (certainly more than religious opinions).

  14. comment
    Comment #25731717

    A message on Twitter: > Someone take this clown out NOW! #assassinatetrump utter evil this man! #DonaldTrump I’m on Twitter and it seems like this stuff is not uncommon there and s…

  15. comment
    Comment #25729446

    Americans sure like this bad faith argument. If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck... If you're free to communicate anything on public owned spaces on the internet but …

  16. comment
    Comment #25729308

    That's not how it works. The decision was entirely political. Twitter is full of assassination calls but it's in no danger of getting banned: https://twitter.com/hashtag/assassinat…

  17. comment
    Comment #25729234

    Then Twitter should be banned too because it's full of calls for political assassinations: https://twitter.com/hashtag/assassinatetrump

  18. comment
    Comment #25729193

    There are tweets from 2016 calling for Trump's assassination. When is Apple going to take down the Twitter app? Here's just a search I did now: https://twitter.com/hashtag/assassin…

  19. comment
    Comment #25729099

    Just accept collective punishment bro.

  20. comment
    Comment #25675001

    Humor aside, intercourse and discourse are synonyms. Although, intercourse is often used as short for "sexual intercourse". But you are pretty much asking for that joke (like when …

  21. comment
    Comment #25672719

    I guess that's part of the plan, give it for free and make it indispensable and then reap the rewards. Feels like a drug operation. :(

  22. comment
    Comment #25662564

    You might be living in a bubble if you think HN is alt-right. Trump got 46.9 % of the vote. He has nowhere near that level of support here.

  23. comment
    Comment #25662489

    It was peaceful. Very few people got murdered.

  24. comment
    Comment #25620945

    > I'd genuinely like clarity on why it's considered a matter of civil liberty to develop whatever you want and force Apple to distribute it on their store? Some value the civil lib…

  25. comment
    Comment #25604811

    3.17 billion in 2019 dollars, or 1.11 if you exclude the sunk costs.