Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — paulcsmith

paulcsmith

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 08, 2014, 3:03 PM UTC
HN karma
60
Public activity
30 items

About paulcsmith

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #23641321

    Right now I'd say we need to make it easier to work with nested params so you can easily save Parent + (n) children. Easier handling of uploaded files is another big one. It's bein…

  2. comment
    Comment #23618979

    Hello! I'm the creator of the Lucky web framework https://luckyframework.org . I've been building it for about 3 years and we've got a number of people using it in production. It s…

  3. comment
    Comment #23618950

    author of Lucky here. Would love to hear what you don't like about Lucky's ORM (Avram). It is not quite as feature complete as ActiveRecord, but in some ways it has more features (…

  4. comment
    Comment #21055570

    Totally agree. If this happened post 1.0 I’d be concerned. But pre 1.0 this is what I’d expect and want. Polish things up because afterward you can’t!

  5. comment
    Comment #20803850

    This looks awesome! What backend framework are you using? I'm the author Lucky and was wondering if you happened to use it on the backend since you are using Crystal

  6. comment
    Comment #20748136

    I'm Paul, the creator of Lucky. If you have any questions or feedback let me know. Always happy to help. If you want to chat about Lucky feel free to hop on https://gitter.im/lucky…

  7. story
  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #17662336

    Author of Lucky here. The title may have been a bit misleading. Lucky is not Ruby on Rails for Crystal. It has a different take on nearly everything in Rails, but it aims to solve …

  10. comment
    Comment #17662321

    I agree. I've been using Rails for 12 years and it is my second favorite framework :) Lucky and Crystal are missing the ecosystem, which the article mentions, but it also adds a lo…

  11. comment
    Comment #17662076

    I do not think Lucky is Ruby on Rails for Crystal. There are new patterns for just about everything. Routing is different, querying is different, views are very different. It is Ra…

  12. story
  13. comment
    Comment #17429144

    I'm glad you were pleasantly surprised. Feel free to hop on https://gitter.im/luckyframework/Lobby if you have any questions or comments!

  14. comment
    Comment #17429141

    You can use Lucky without a database, but if you use one, Postgres is the only support database. You don't need node or yarn if you are using API mode. You can generate an API only…

  15. comment
    Comment #17427355

    https://luckyframework.org

  16. comment
    Comment #17427294

    I've played around with a number of languages and settled on Crystal because: * Speed * Pleasant to use type system * Doesn't get in my way * Catches lots of bugs * Fun! I wrote ht…

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #16317171

    Hey HN! I'm Paul Smith, the creator of Lucky. I created Lucky because I wanted a framework that was fast, fun, productive, and caught lots of bugs that I would normally miss. I'm h…

  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #16148266

    Hi HN, Lucky is a web framework written in Crystal that helps you build web apps quickly, catches bugs for you, and runs incredibly fast. This article explains how actions and rout…

  21. story
  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #15782507

    Can you explain a bit more what you mean? What advantages do "Python variety" lists give you over what Elixir does with lists and tuples?

  24. comment
    Comment #15575536

    This totally makes sense. I think the disadvantage is that this is done at runtime, but assuming you have a test that hits it, it would catch the bug. My colleagues wrote a library…

  25. comment
    Comment #15575195

    And for a Ruby/Elixir/dynamic lang programmer just catching `nil` is actually a pretty big win, even without the custom type. I will go more into depth about leveraging the type sy…