Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — patemmschmitz

patemmschmitz

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jan 12, 2022, 8:40 AM UTC
HN karma
5
Public activity
12 items

About patemmschmitz

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47348096

    A discussion on this point (with some improvements) is now open in the European Commission Interoperable Europe Portal: https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/di…

  2. story
    How to clarify the EUPL compatibility clause?

    The (2017) EUPL-1.2 compatibility clause is as follow: "If the Licensee Distributes or Communicates Derivative Works or copies thereof based upon both the Work and another work lic…

  3. comment
    Comment #39894538

    GPL doesn't count "Application Service Providers" as distribution, but does not prohibit to do so and to share/publish the combined/modified source code; It is just silent regardin…

  4. comment
    Comment #39608997

    You are right: MPLv2 does not enforce contributing upstream. So you turn your manager into a fool (just a little bit). The MPL is probably one of the best F/OSS licenses: clear, co…

  5. comment
    Comment #39608593

    For me - correct me if I'm wrong, the tivoization issue looks mostly related to what is really a "derivative" of your work (i. e. in case the level of dependency of some hardware d…

  6. comment
    Comment #39608473

    You are right, there is a "double coverage". The EUPL just states that the compatible license (applied to the combined derivative work) will prevail in case it conflicts with the E…

  7. comment
    Comment #39608331

    You could add: - the EUPL, like the AGPL, covers all distribution modes (remote or SaaS...) - the EUPL includes a CDO (contributor declaration of origin) - the EUPL specifies more …

  8. comment
    Comment #37321841

    It is a constant policy, from all "FSF-followers-free-software-activists" to try to discourage, on all public discussion forums, the use of the EUPL that is a copyleft license "oth…

  9. comment
    Comment #37206613

    Agreed. There was a debate on the point "is the EUPL strong or weak copyleft?" It is not "strong copyleft" as the FSF conceives it, simply because European Law excludes license "vi…

  10. comment
    Comment #35583476

    Hello all, I found this debate after 4 days of "internet vacation" to fulfill a dream of my grandson (10 years old) to go with me on the Legoland roller coaster in Denmark. What sh…

  11. comment
    Comment #35579756

    True! Regarding distribution as a service, the EUPL is like the AGPL, but simply written, short and clear. It is copyleft, but allows combined derivatives to be distributed under 1…

  12. comment
    Comment #29903857

    "Communication to the public" is a European Law concept that covers remote access. "Distribution" rather means the transfer of the Work (i.e. to be executed on the recipient device…