Viewing profile — parliament32
parliament32
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 23, 2013, 2:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,667
- Public activity
- 1,648 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About parliament32
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48676728
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48664377
Why fork at all? Why not just vendor the dependency and slop the changes you want on top of it? You can even pull from upstream down the line for the latest updates. The problem is…
-
comment
Comment #48664274
Well, yes, exactly. And yet nobody but the biggest corp-sponsored projects get anything more than negligible donations. So what does this tell us? These "contributors" are happy to…
-
comment
Comment #48663713
Add a mechanism to donate tokens towards the maintainers' LLMs for a particular ticket and this whole class of problems will be resolved all at once.
-
comment
Comment #48663652
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48663083
I would kill for an LLM-free platform. Personally I just stopped accepting public contributions entirely. File issues, sure, but no PRs apart from accounts I added who have contrib…
-
comment
Comment #48662993
They're stuck in this idea that somehow they're better at prompting the slop generator than anyone else, therefore they're helpful and people definitely want their output merged in…
-
comment
Comment #48662930
For now. Give it another half year and "I contribute to open source" will carry the same weight as "I donate to charity" ie nobody cares because any idiot can do it. I wonder how l…
-
comment
Comment #48577744
They are paying influencers to pretend they use LLMs, and discredit Chinese models: https://www.wired.com/story/super-pac-backed-by-openai-and-p...
-
comment
Comment #48497360
I love how even the "demo build" doesn't work. https://fablepool.com/projects/7 Rather, it did work at milestone 14, but then regressed at milestone 15, where it changed the link f…
-
comment
Comment #48489893
Fun schemes like this are all just lipstick on the pig of "asking nicely", unfortunately -- it's just a more creative iteration of "Simon says". It'll improve the probabilities, su…
-
comment
Comment #48481066
> separating data from instructions There's been a lot of talk about this (for years, honestly), but it all stems from a fundamental nonunderstanding of how LLMs work. There is no …
- story
-
comment
Comment #48448860
The hilarious part is that spam actually makes money, while slop does not. There's no reason to tire out if it's profitable, right? Meanwhile.. have you ever paid for a vibe-coded …
-
comment
Comment #48419231
Personally, they're going wayyy too hard on the AI stuff. I just want an interface to git and maybe an issue tracker.
-
comment
Comment #48418927
Just goes to show how much demand there is. HN really needs a containment board.
-
comment
Comment #48418522
Thank you for (re)writing this in your own voice. Despite how much effort might be put into methodology, data collection, etc.. reading slop is unbearable, full stop. It's not inte…
-
comment
Comment #48408513
What a pleasant surprise. I was positive S&P would get strongarmed into the bamboozle like Nasdaq but it seems they have a bit more integrity. Good for them.
-
comment
Comment #48375924
> the unsolicited summaries and auto replies are a means of artificially inflating the usage metrics for the language model features This, I think, is the part that irks me the mos…
-
comment
Comment #48374446
Step 1: Require companies to submit product for "review" Step 2: Complain about how the OSS/Chinese/whatever models are doing releases without approval Step 3: Prohibit, because "s…
-
comment
Comment #48328991
Spicy. Look, I think you're missing my point a little bit. Let's simplify it to risk, since that's what kicked off this conversation. Your pension or whatever holds an ETF that (so…
-
comment
Comment #48327467
The ETF that seemingly arbitrarily changes its rules? In such a short time frame too? This change is going proposal to implementation in.. what, two weeks total? I don't know about…
-
comment
Comment #48327083
Even with trading news, slop generators are way, way too slow to be useful.
-
comment
Comment #48326963
...which is why we have GAAP-recognized metrics, right? To prevent fudge-ability? And those metrics.. they're deliberately not publishing? Makes you think.
-
comment
Comment #48326910
Because they're long-term, yes. It'll really come down to how much you're willing to pay for monthly Elon-shenanigans-insurance. I'm very interested in seeing how the market prices…