Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — pantsforbirds

pantsforbirds

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 3:40 PM UTC
HN karma
392
Public activity
169 items

About pantsforbirds

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48721181

    I appreciate the comparison to Timescale, DuckDB, and ClickHouse. It's interesting to see the differences between a more specialized db, like Quest, and DuckDB/ClickHouse.

  2. comment
    Comment #48693129

    Ah yes, I specifically mean you can keep earning points infinitely. After the board is full, it resets the game, and you get points for each piece on the board. I usually stop the …

  3. comment
    Comment #48692048

    I'm fairly sure the code snippets aren't equal in the last python example: ```python names = sorted({name.lower() for name in users if name}) ``` vs. ```gossamer let names = users …

  4. comment
    Comment #48691926

    I've never seen the level of anti-scientific, straight misinformation as I have with data centers. I genuinely think it's to the point where the antivaxxers have a stronger scienti…

  5. comment
    Comment #48691491

    The way the game is seeded, it's 100% deterministic. So if you can scan enough potential moves / second, it's very easy to infinitely play the game at a fast rate. Shockingly, Clau…

  6. comment
    Comment #48689928

    I started by pulling the game source locally and doing some initial testing with a few solvers. I ended up having Claude make a 1-for-1 perfect sim of the original game using rust …

  7. comment
    Comment #48689295

    I had a lot of fun playing the game. I also made a local solver to see how far you can theoretically get, and it's definitely infinite if you play perfectly. Working on the local s…

  8. comment
    Comment #48679471

    Fun article and worth the read, but sadly none of the LaTeX was rendered for me (assuming it was supposed to).

  9. comment
    Comment #48564531

    I would have loved to buy my children some small C&H figurines or, especially, a stuffed tiger, but I do respect Waterson's decision

  10. comment
    Comment #48374624

    How many existing data centers do you think you rely on each day? Almonds do not realistically improve my life in nearly the way the internet does, but also who am I to say whether…

  11. comment
    Comment #48374598

    Like producing more tax revenue for a county than the rest of the county combined? That payoff allows for insane levels of infrastructure improvement at literally no cost to locals…

  12. comment
    Comment #48374587

    In the case of the Stratos / Box Elder County mega-datacenter, they are planning to use gas turbines to run off of the nearby Ruby Pipeline. It's a pretty tidy solution, if you ask…

  13. comment
    Comment #48374553

    The mega-scale ones almost all have power as part of the ramp-up process. They are also a massive tax benefit. Looking at the controversial Stratos data center in Box Elder County:…

  14. comment
    Comment #48372320

    Except datacenters are actually very low environmental impact. As long as they provide their own power, they have MUCH lower impact than most farms would.

  15. comment
    Comment #48037646

    It's a neat product, but I am also a bit confused by the choice to use C as the primary language. I would think you'd want something more ergonomic since this is entirely I/O bound…

  16. comment
    Comment #47976760

    I don't understand why people on this website hate Grok for being tied to Elon Musk, but also have no problem with models that are directly sponsored by the CCP.

  17. comment
    Comment #47976371

    Grok and Gemini are the ones I tend to use for finding news related to breaking events. Both were really nice during the Iran incident when I wanted to find out things as they were…

  18. comment
    Comment #47974878

    If your data follows a relatively uniform distribution, you can try out interpolation search: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpolation_search

  19. comment
    Comment #47369912

    The US doesn't have a desire to annex Canada; that's very silly. And the reason Russia doesn't have the capability is because of Canada's alliance with the US.

  20. comment
    Comment #47369891

    That seems entirely plausible. I based my comment on one of Elon's tweets (xeets?) about it: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2028261823678759335?s=20

  21. comment
    Comment #47369868

    Ignoring the ... less substantive portions of your response > I can both deny you the means to defend yourself, forcing you to rely on me for protection. That's the definition of a…

  22. comment
    Comment #47369465

    > Many people believe that the US annexing Canada is a higher probability than either China or Russia doing so. All three are very low probabilities. I believe those people are bei…

  23. comment
    Comment #47369124

    There is a separate entity, StarShield, that the US military uses. I think it's a fully separate set of satellites, but I'm not 100% on that.

  24. comment
    Comment #47369080

    You can't simultaneously argue that NATO is a "protection racket" for the US to sell weapons and control European foreign policy, and also argue that the EU would be in trouble wit…

  25. comment
    Comment #47242908

    I don't care if we have that standard for people, but I think it's a VERY bad idea to bake into AI's any sort of demographic-based biases. Why would you not want to ensure we don't…